International trade, economic growth and environment in Senegal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18559/rielf.2021.1.6Keywords:
international trade, economic growth, CO2 emissions, environmental Kuznets curveAbstract
This paper aimed to bridge the gap in the literature on the relationship between international trade, economic growth and the environment by contributing to a new ana- lysis by country. In this regard, the relationship between international trade and carbon (CO2) emissions was investigated by simultaneously checking the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis. From time series data over the period 1971-2016, our methodo- logy relied on cointegration analysis with the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) test approach. The results show that the intensity of international trade decreases CO2 emissions in Senegal. In addition, the analysis confirms the long-term U-shaped hypothesis between CO2 emissions and economic growth.
Downloads
References
Anderson, K. (1992). Agricultural trade liberalization and the environment: A global perspective. The World Economy, 15(1), 153-171.
View in Google Scholar
Ang, J. (2007). CO2 emissions, energy consumption and output in France. Energy Policy, 35, 4772-4778.
View in Google Scholar
Ang, J. (2008). Economic development, pollutant emissions and energy consumption in Malaysia. Journal of Policy Modeling, 30, 271-278.
View in Google Scholar
Antweiler, W., Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2001). Is free trade good for the environment?. American Economic Review, 91(4), 877-908.
View in Google Scholar
Beckerman, W. (1992). Economic growth and the environment : Whose growth? Whose environment?. World Development, 20, 481-496.
View in Google Scholar
Ben Zineb, S. (2019). Décomposition des effets de la structure de l’activité économique sur la pollution de l’air : développement théorique et analyse empirique. International Journal of Economics and Strategic Management of Business Press, (15), 42-62.
View in Google Scholar
Copeland, B. R., & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, growth and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(1), 7-71.
View in Google Scholar
Cook, Z., & Tobey, J. (1992). Agricultural protection and the environment : A comparative analysis. USDA-ERS and OECD Environment Directorate.
View in Google Scholar
Dean, J. M. (2002). Does trade liberalization harm the environment? A new test. Canadian Journal of Economics, 35(4), 819-842.
View in Google Scholar
Eiras, A., & Schaefer, B. (2001, September 27). Trade : The best way to protect the environ- ment. Backgrounder. The Heritage Foundation, 1480.
View in Google Scholar
Engle, R., & Granger, C. (1987). Co-integration and error correction : Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276.
View in Google Scholar
Frankel, J. A., & Rose, A. K. (2005). Is trade good or bad for the environment? Sorting out the causality. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(1), 85-91.
View in Google Scholar
Gale, L. R., & Mendez, J. A. (1998). A note on the relationship between trade, growth, and the environment. International Review of Economics and Finance, 7, 53-61.
View in Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. (National Bureau of Economic Research No. 3914).
View in Google Scholar
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1993). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. In P. Garber (Ed.), The Mexico-U.S. free trade agreement (pp. 13- 56). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
View in Google Scholar
Harbaugh, W. T., Levinson, A., & Wilson, D. M. (2002). Reexamining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(3), 541-551.
View in Google Scholar
Harris, H., & Sollis, R. (2003). Applied time series modelling and forecasting. West Sussex: Wiley.
View in Google Scholar
International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). (1990). Environmental aspects of agricultural development). IFPRl Policy Briefs, 6.
View in Google Scholar
Lucas, R., Wheeler, D., & Hettige, H. (1992). Economic development, environmental regu- lation, and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution, 1960-88. (Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 1062). The Word Bank
View in Google Scholar
Lutz, E. (1992). Agricultural trade liberalization, price changes, and environmental effects. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2, 79-89.
View in Google Scholar
Pesaran M., Shin, Y. (1999). An autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach to cointegration analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar
Pesaran, M, Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
View in Google Scholar
Shahbaz, M., Solarin, S. A., & Ozturk, I. (2016). Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis and the role of globalization in selected African countries. Ecological Indicator, 67, 623-636.
View in Google Scholar
Smulders, S. (2004). Economic growth, liberalisation and the environment. In C. Cleveland (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Energy Economics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
View in Google Scholar
Soytas, U., Sari, R., & Ewing, T. (2007). Energy consumption, income and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics, 62(3-4), 482-489.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Poznań University of Economics and Business
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
