Hybrid Occupational Pension Schemes in Selected Countries

Authors

  • Anna Gierusz University of Gdańsk

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18559/SOEP.2018.7.1

Keywords:

Employee pension programmes, Pensions, Retirement programs, Occupational Pension Schemes, Retirement benefits

Abstract

Two main types of occupational pension schemes are defined contribution (DC) schemes and defined benefit (DB) schemes. In DC schemes benefit amount depends on many factors, such as the amount of contributions paid into the scheme and rate of the scheme's investment returns. In DB schemes benefit amount is known and defined in advance, and is independent of the rate of investment returns. This means that in DC schemes risk (e.g. investment or longevity risk) is borne by the member and in DB schemes by the employer. Hybrid pension schemes are schemes which are not purely DC or DB, but a mixture of both. These schemes allow for the risk to be shared between the member and employer, making them more attractive than traditional forms. The article presents the most common types of hybrid pension schemes and characterises different variations functioning in selected countries. Data on contributions paid into occupational pension schemes has been used to illustrate the prevalence of hybrid schemes in selected countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Blommestein, H., Janssen, P., Kortleve, N. i Yermo, J. (2009). Moving beyond the "DB vs DC" debate: The appeal of hybrid pension plans. Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, 2(2), 66-76.
View in Google Scholar

Clark, G. L. i Monk, A. H. B. (2006). The "crisis" in defined benefit corporate pension liabilities. Part I: Scope of the problem. Pensions, 12(1), 43-54.
View in Google Scholar

Clark, G. L. i Monk, A. H. B. (2007). The "crisis" in defined benefit corporate pension liabilities. Part II: Current solutions and future prospects. Pensions, 12(2), 68-81.
View in Google Scholar

Davis, R. (2013). The Tracker Plan: A controlled risk defined contribution retirement program. J. Marshall Law Review, 46(3), 681.
View in Google Scholar

Davis, R. i Madland, D. (2013). American retirement savings could be much better. Center for American Progress.
View in Google Scholar

De Nederlandsche Bank Statistics. (b.d.). Pobrane 28 grudnia 2015 z http://www.dnb.nl/en/statistics/statistics-dnb/financial-institutions/pensioenfondsen/pension-schemes/index.jsp.
View in Google Scholar

Department for Work and Pensions, UK. (2014), Automatic enrolment into a workplace pension. Key facts. Pobrane z https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/automatic-enrolment-key-facts-booklet.
View in Google Scholar

The Dutch pension system. An overview of the key aspects. (2013). Dutch Association of Industry-wide Pension Funds i Dutch Association of Company Pension Funds Pobrane z http://www.pensiondevelopment.org/documenten/The%20Dutch%20Pension%20System.pdf.
View in Google Scholar

Federal Social Insurance Office, Switzerland. (b.d.). Pobrane 17 października 2016 z http://www.bsv.admin.ch/themen/vorsorge/00039/00335/index.html?lang=en.
View in Google Scholar

Fuerst, D. E. (2006). Risk allocation in retirement plans: A better solution. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 18(1), 95-103.
View in Google Scholar

Guðmundsson, B., Bennewitz, B., Asgrímsson, B. Z., Bragadóttir, K. I. i Halldórsson, S. (2014). Retirement savings adequacy. Measurement in Iceland. The Financial Supervisory Authority in Iceland Research Project.
View in Google Scholar

Hill, T., Pang, G. i Warshawsky, M. (2010). Hybrid pension plans: A comprehensive look at their history, economics and features, Towers Watson Insider. Pobrane z towerswatson.com/research/insider.
View in Google Scholar

HM Revenue & Customs [HMRC]. (b.d.). Pensions Tax Manual. Pobrane 28 grudnia z http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/manuals/ptmanual/ptm061100.htm#IDARIUPB.
View in Google Scholar

Johnson, R. W. i Uccello, C. E. (2004). Cash balance plans: What do they mean for retirement security? National Tax Journal, LVII(2), Part 1 June.
View in Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, J. H. i Turner, J. (2005). Cash balance pension plans and older workers, AARP Public Policy Institute Issue Brief.
View in Google Scholar

Mackenzie, S. (2010). Hybrids and other alternatives to the traditional pension, AARP Public Policy Institute Research Report.
View in Google Scholar

OECD Statistics. (b.d.). Pobrane 28 grudnia 2015 z bazy danych OECD http://stats.oecd.org/#.
View in Google Scholar

OECD. (2009), OECD Private Pensions Outlook 2008, OECD Publishing, Paris, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264044395-en.
View in Google Scholar

OECD. (2015), Pensions at a glance 2015: OECD and G20 indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/pension_glance-2015-en.
View in Google Scholar

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation [PBGC]. (2014). Pension Insurance Data Tables. Pobrane z http://www.pbgc.gov/prac/data-books.html.
View in Google Scholar

Pugh, C. i Yermo, J. (2008). Funding regulations and risk sharing (OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions, No. 17). OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/241841441002.
View in Google Scholar

Ross, D. i Wills, L. (2002). The shift from defined benefit to defined contribution retirement plans and the provisioning of retirement savings (Pensions Institute Discussion Paper PI-0210). London: The Pensions Institute, Cass Business School, City University.
View in Google Scholar

Schouten, E. i Robinson, T. (2012). Defined ambition pensions - Have the Dutch found the golden mean for retirement savings? Pensions, 17(4), 334-341.
View in Google Scholar

Sutcliffe, C. (2010). Back to the future: A long term solution to the occupational pension crisis (Pensions Institute Discussion Paper PI-1011). London: The Pensions Institute, Cass Business School, City University.
View in Google Scholar

Turner, J. (2014). Hybrid pensions: Risk sharing arrangements for pension plan sponsors and participants, The Society of Actuaries Research Project.
View in Google Scholar

Verheijden, J. (2010). From average pay DB to collective DC: Defining the risk transfer, Netspar. Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement Thesis.
View in Google Scholar

Wesbroom, K. i Reay, T. (2005), Hybrid pension plans: UK and international experience, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report 271.
View in Google Scholar

Wilson, J. (2008). Pension schemes for 21st century: Is there a third way? Pensions, 13(4), 191-199.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2018-07-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Gierusz, A. (2018). Hybrid Occupational Pension Schemes in Selected Countries. Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, 6(7), 7-21. https://doi.org/10.18559/SOEP.2018.7.1