Terms of Efficiency Peer Pressure or How to Respect the Standards in Social Organizations

Authors

  • David Masclet Université de Rennes 1

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18559/SOEP.2016.3.7

Keywords:

Effectiveness, Social organisations

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the conditions under which peer pressure helps in deterring the free riding problem. The comparison of situations with and without peer pressure indicates that under certain conditions peer pressure may solve the well-known free riding problem. However there are several limitations to peer pressure including (1) the fact that peer monitoring is costly when production and monitoring efforts are substituted; (2) the threat of sanctions is not credible when sanctions are costly to implement. Nevertheless, strongly inequality averse individuals may still be encouraged to punish free riders despite the existence of a cost to - in the punishment of free riders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, C.M., Putterman, L., 2006,Do Non-Strategic Sanctions Obey the Law of Demand? The Demand for Punishment in the Voluntary Contribution Mechanism, Ga-mes and Economic Behavior, no. 54 (1), pp. 1-24, DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2004.08.007.
View in Google Scholar

Aoki, M., 1986, Horizontal versus Vertical Information Structure of the Firm, American Economic Review, no. 76 (5), pp. 971-83.
View in Google Scholar

Arnott, R., Stiglitz, J., 1991, Moral Hazard and Non Market Institutions: Dysfunctional Crowding out or Peer Monitoring?, American Economic Review, vol. 81, no. 1.pp. 179-190, DOI: 10.1016/201309006.
View in Google Scholar

Barron, J.M., Gjerde, K.P., 1997, Peer Pressure in an Agency Relationship , Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 234-254, DOI: 10.1086/209832.
View in Google Scholar

Bochet, O., Page, T., Putterman, L., 2006, Communication and Punishment in Voluntary Contribution Experiments, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, no. 60 (1), 11-26, DOI: 10.1016/j.jebo.2003.06.006.
View in Google Scholar

Carmichael, L., 1988, Incentive in Academics: Why Is There Tenure? , Journal of Political Economy, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 453-472, DOI: 10.1086/261547.
View in Google Scholar

Carpenter, J.P. 2007, Punishing Free Riders: How Group Size Affects Mutual Monitoring and the Provision of Public Goods, Games and Economic Behavior, no. 60 (1), pp. 31-51, DOI: 10.1016/j.geb.2006.08.011.
View in Google Scholar

Coleman J. 1990, Foundations of Social Theory, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, DOI: 10.1093/sf/69.2.625.
View in Google Scholar

Demougin, D., Fluet, C., 1999, Costly Sanctions and the Maximum Penalty Principle, Working Paper, no. 100, Université du Québec à Montréal.
View in Google Scholar

Dong, X., Dow, G., 1993, Monitoring Costs in Chinese Agricultural Teams, Journal of political Economy, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 539-553, DOI: 10.1086/261886.
View in Google Scholar

Fehr, E., Gachter, S., 2000, Cooperation and Punishment, American Economic Review, no. 90(4), pp. 980-994, DOI 10.1257/aer.90.4.980.
View in Google Scholar

Fehr, E., Schmidt, K., 1999, A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation, Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 114, 817-868, DOI: 10.1162/003355399556151.
View in Google Scholar

Francis, H., 1985, The law, Oral Tradition and the Mining Community, Journal of Law and Society, 12, 267-271, DOI: 10.2307/1410120.
View in Google Scholar

Frank, R., 1994, Microeconomics and Behavior, New York, W.W. Norton & Company.
View in Google Scholar

Gibbons, R., 1992, Game Theory for Applied Economists, Princeton University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Hirshleifer, D., Rasmusen, E., 1989, Cooperation in a Repeated Prisoners' Dilemma with Ostracism, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 12, pp. 87-106, DOI: 10.1016/0167-2681(89)90078-4.
View in Google Scholar

Holmstrom, B., 1982, Moral Hazard in Teams, The Bell Journal of Economics, pp. 324-340, DOI: 10.2307/3003457.
View in Google Scholar

Kandel, E., Lazear, P., 1992, Peer Pressure and Partnerships , Journal of Political Economics, vol. 100, no. 4, pp. 801-817, DOI: 10.1086/261840.
View in Google Scholar

Lazear, E., 1989, Pay Equality and Industrial Politics, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 97, iss. 3, pp. 561-580.
View in Google Scholar

Masclet, D., Noussair, C., Tucker, S., Villeval, M.C., 2003. Monetary and Non-Monetary Punishment in the Voluntary Contributions Mechanism, American Economic Review, no. 93(1), pp. 366-380, DOI: 10.1257/000282803321455359.
View in Google Scholar

Miller, W., 1992, Managerial Dilemmas: the Political Economy of Hierarchy, Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar

Posner, A.R., Rasmusen, E.R., 1999, Creating and Enforcing Norms, with Special Reference to Sanctions, Working Paper, University of Indiana, DOI: 10.1016/s0144-8188(99)00013-7.
View in Google Scholar

Sacerdote, B., 2000, Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results for Datmouth Roomates, Working Paper, NBER, DOI: 10.3386/w7469.
View in Google Scholar

Stiglitz, 1990, Peer Monitoring and Credit Markets, The World Bank Economic Review, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 351-366, DOI: 10.1093/wber/4.3.351.
View in Google Scholar

Varian, H.R., 1990, Monitoring Agents with Other Agents, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, pp. 153-174. /40751313.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2026-04-14

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Masclet , D. (2026). Terms of Efficiency Peer Pressure or How to Respect the Standards in Social Organizations. Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, 4(3), 163-185. https://doi.org/10.18559/SOEP.2016.3.7