Investissement Direct Étranger, transition energétique et degradation de l’environnement : évidence des pays d’Afrique subsaharienne
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.18559/rielf.2024.1.1635Mots-clés :
climate change, Sub-Sahara Africa, FDIRésumé
L’objectif – L’objectif de cette étude est d’analyser la relation entre les investissements directs étrangers (IDE), la transition énergétique et la pollution de l'environnement en Afrique subsaharienne sur la période 1985 à 2020.
Conception/méthodologie/approche – Diverses approches économétriques ont été utilisées afin d’obtenir des résultats robustes. Le test de dépendance transversale a été effectué et les résultats ont confirmé la présence d'une dépendance transversale entre les variables, ce qui a permis l'utilisation du test de racine unitaire de seconde génération. L'analyse a été réalisée à l'aide de la méthode de Driscoll et Kraay, qui permet de traiter l'endogénéité, l'autocorrélation et l'hétéroscédasticité.
Résultats : Les résultats montrent que l’hypothèse << pollutio haven>> est confirmée et que l’utilisation des énergies renouvelables qui mesure la transition énergétique diminue la pollution environnementale. Aussi l’éffet couplé des investissement direct à l étranger et les énergies renouvelable minimise la pollution de l environnement .La densité de la population, le commerce et le produit intérieur brut augmente la pollution de l'environnement.
Originalité/valeur –Cette étude contribue à la littérature existant sur l’analyse de la relation entre investissement direct à l’étranger et la pollution de l’environnement ou énergies renouvelable et pollution de l’environnement en portant un regard particulier sur l’effet couplé de l’investissement direct à l’étranger et l’usage des énergies renouvelables sur la qualité de l’environnement. Nous pouvons suggérer à partir de ces résultats que d’ample efforts devraient être faits afin d'augmenter le taux d'investissement direct étranger dans les pays d'Afrique subsaharienne, en particulier l'attrait des technologies vertes qui peuvent aider à produire davantage d'énergies renouvelables.
Téléchargements
Références
Abdelhamid, I. H., Hauglustaine, J. M., & Abakar, M. T. (2016). La promotion des énergies renouvelables : une réponse durable à la problématique énergétique des ménages ruraux au Tchad. Revue des Énergies Renouvelables, 19(1).
View in Google Scholar
Acharyya, J. (2009). FDI, growth and the environment: Evidence from India on CO2 emission during the last two decades. Journal of Economic Development, 34(1), 43–58.
View in Google Scholar
Amoah, J. O., Alagidede, I. A., & Sare, Y. A. (2023). Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on carbon emission in sub-Saharan Africa: The mediating and moderating roles of industrialization and trade openness. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3), 2266168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2266168
View in Google Scholar
Bayale, N., Ali, E., Tchagnao, A., & Nakumuryango, A. (2021). Determinants of renewable energy production in WAEMU countries: New empirical insights and policy implications. International Journal of Green Energy, 162, 733–741.
View in Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, M., Paramati, S. R., Ozturk, I., & Bhattacharya, S. (2016). The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from top 38 countries. Applied Energy, 162, 733–741.
View in Google Scholar
Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review Of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253.
View in Google Scholar
Brock, W. A., & Taylor, M. S. (2010). The green Solow model. Journal of Economic Growth, 15(2), 127–153.
View in Google Scholar
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future—call for action. Environmental Conser- vation, 14(4), 291–294.
View in Google Scholar
Caglar, A. E. (2020). The importance of renewable energy consumption and FDI inflows in reducing environmental degradation: Bootstrap ARDL bound test in selected 9 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121663.
View in Google Scholar
Chel, A., & Kaushik, G. (2011). Renewable energy for sustainable agriculture. Agronomy For Sustainable Development, 31(1), 91–118.
View in Google Scholar
Chihab, K., & Ouia, A. (2021). Energies renouvelables et efficacité énergétique pour un développement énergétique durable au Maroc. Revue Internationale des Sciences de Gestion, 4(3).
View in Google Scholar
De Hoyos, R. E., & Sarafidis, V. (2006). Testing for cross-sectional dependence in panel-data models. The Stata Journal, 6(4), 482–496.
View in Google Scholar
Eastin, J., & Zeng, K. (2007). Foreign Direct Investment and labor rights protection in China: A tale of two sectors. In China in the twenty-first century (pp. 89-111). Palgrave Macmillan.
View in Google Scholar
Eskeland, G. A., & Harrison, A. E. (2002). Moving to greener pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis. NBER Working Paper, 8888. http://www.nber.org/papers/w8888
View in Google Scholar
Frangou, M., Aryblia, M., Tournaki, S., & Tsoutsos, T. (2018). Renewable energy performance
View in Google Scholar
contracting in the tertiary sector standardization to overcome barriers in Greece. Renewable Energy, 125, 829–839.
View in Google Scholar
Gorus, M. S., & Aslan, M. (2019). Impacts of economic indicators on environmental degradation: Evidence from MENA countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 103, 259–268.
View in Google Scholar
IRENA. (2018). Renewable energy auctions: Cases from sub-Saharan Africa. International Renewable Energy Agency.
View in Google Scholar
Kellenberg, D. K. (2009). An empirical investigation of the pollution haven effect with strategic environment and trade policy. Journal of International Economics, 78(2), 242–255.
View in Google Scholar
Liu, X., Zhang, S., & Bae, J. (2017). The impact of renewable energy and agriculture on carbon dioxide emissions: Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve in four selected ASEAN countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1239–1247.
View in Google Scholar
Lokonon, B. O., & Mounirou, I. (2019). Does foreign direct investment impede forest area in sub‐Saharan Africa? Natural Resources Forum, 43(4), 230–240.
View in Google Scholar
MacDermott, R. (2009). A panel study of the pollution-haven hypothesis. Global Economy Journal, 9(1), 1–14.
View in Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(1), 631–652.
View in Google Scholar
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Rander, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972). The limits of growth. Universe Books.
View in Google Scholar
Mert, M., & Bölük, G. (2016). Do foreign direct investment and renewable energy consumption affect the CO2 emissions? New evidence from a panel ARDL approach to Kyoto Annex countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(21), 21669–21681.
View in Google Scholar
Miketa, A., & Merven, B. (2013). West African power pool: Planning and prospects for renewable energy. International Renewable Energy Agency.
View in Google Scholar
Nachoui, M. (2019). Les énergies renouvelables et l’aménagement du territoire: De la transition énergétique et écologique au développement durable au Maroc? Espace Géographique et Société Marocaine, (26).
View in Google Scholar
Nasir, M. A., Huynh, T. L. D., & Tram, H. T. X. (2019). Role of financial development, economic growth & foreign direct investment in driving climate change: A case of emerging ASEAN. Journal of Environmental Management, 242, 131–141.
View in Google Scholar
Onifade, S. T., Erdoğan, S., Alagöz, M., & Bekun, F. V. (2021). Renewables as a pathway to environmental sustainability targets in the era of trade liberalization: Empirical evidence from Turkey and the Caspian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(31), 41663–41674.
View in Google Scholar
Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312.
View in Google Scholar
Reilly, J. M. (2012). Green growth and efficient use of natural resources. Energy Economics, 34(1), 85–93.
View in Google Scholar
Shahbaz, M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., & Sinha, A. (2019). Foreign direct Investment—CO2 emissions nexus in Middle East and North African countries: Importance of biomass energy consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 603–614.
View in Google Scholar
Talukdar, D., & Meisner, C. M. (2001). Does the private sector help or hurt the environment? Evidence from carbon dioxide pollution in developing countries. World Development, 29(5), 827–840.
View in Google Scholar
To, A. H., Ha, D. T. T., Nguyen, H. M., & Vo, D. H. (2019). The impact of foreign direct investment on environment degradation: evidence from emerging markets in Asia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(9), 1636.
View in Google Scholar
Uzar, U., & Eyuboglu, K. (2019). The nexus between income inequality and CO2 emissions in Turkey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, 149–157.
View in Google Scholar
Waldkirch, A., & Gopinath, M. (2008). Pollution control and foreign direct investment in Mexico: An industry-level analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 41(3), 289–313.
View in Google Scholar
Walter, I., & Ugelow, J. L. (1979). Environmental policies in developing countries. Ambio, 8, 102–109.
View in Google Scholar
Xie, Q., & Liu, J. (2019). Combined nonlinear effects of economic growth and urbanization on CO2 emissions in China: Evidence from a panel data partially linear additive model. Energy, 186, 115868.
View in Google Scholar
Xu, C., Zhao, W., Zhang, M., & Cheng, B. (2021). Pollution haven or halo? The role of the energy transition in the impact of FDI on SO2 emissions. Science of the Total Environment, 763, 143002.
View in Google Scholar
Zarsky, L. (1999). Havens, halos and spaghetti: Entangling the evidence about foreign divestment and the environment. Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment, 3(8), 47–74.
View in Google Scholar
Téléchargements
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Copyright Owodon Afo-Loko 2024
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d’Utilisation Commerciale - Partage dans les Mêmes Conditions 4.0 International.
