Towards Economic Stagnation? Hungarian Fiscal Policy under the Governments of V. Orbán (1998-2002, 2010-2014)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18559/zqy5t609Keywords:
Government spending, Employment, Economic growth, Consolidation, Pension schemes, Economic policy, Public debtAbstract
This article presents a critical analysis of the fiscal reforms introduced by two cabinets led by Viktor Orbán in Hungary (1998-2002 and 2010-2014) as well as recommendations for Poland formulated on the basis of the analysis. Despite the high debt to GDP ratio, the main tool of taking the Hungarian economy out of the economic crisis was an expansion of public spending. It is worth noting that there was also a fiscal austerity package implemented at the same time, which reduced government spending and increased government revenue. Therefore, the uniqueness of the so-called "Hungarian approach" is characterised by a combination of demand policy tools (i.e. an increase in public spending) and austerity package tools (i.e. a rise in public revenue and a fall in public expenditure). The unorthodoxy of the "Hungarian approach" to fiscal consolidation is reflected in an improper ratio of austerity measures (aimed at raising revenues and reducing spending) to demand measures (raising spending). This approach, considered in terms of long-term macroeconomic effects, is open to doubt.
Downloads
References
Alesina, A., Ardagna, S., 2009, Large Changes in Fiscal Policy: Taxes vs. Spending, NBER Working Paper Series, WP 15438, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
Alesina, A., Ardagna, S., 2012, The Design of Fiscal Adjustments, NBER Working Paper Series, WP 18423, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
Baker, D., 2010, The Myth of Expansionary Fiscal Austerity, Center for Economic and Policy Research, October.
View in Google Scholar
Bönker, F., 2006, The Political Economy of Fiscal Reform in Central-Eastern Europe: Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic from 1989 to EU Accession, Edward Elgar Pub., Cheltenham, UK.
View in Google Scholar
EBRD, Transition Report, edycje 1998-2002, London.
View in Google Scholar
Eurostat http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat [dostęp: 08.04.2014].
View in Google Scholar
Guichard, S., Kennedy, M., Wurzel, E., André, C., 2007, What Promotes Fiscal Consolidation: OECD Country Experiences, OECD Economics Department Working Paper, no. 553.
View in Google Scholar
Guzikowski, M., Ambroży A., 2013, Wnioski płynące dla Polski z doświadczeń szwedzkich w prowadzeniu aktywnych polityk rynku pracy (ALMP), Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów, Zeszyt Naukowy, 134, s. 95-116.
View in Google Scholar
Hajnal, G. 2014, Unorthodoxy at Work: an Assessment of Hungary's Post-2010 Governance Reforms, IRSPM XVIII, Annual Conference, 9-11 April, Ottawa.
View in Google Scholar
Hungary Premier Credits His 'Unorthodox' Course for Economic Rebound, wywiad The Wall Street Journal z premierem Węgier, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424-127887324263404578613861507944932 [dostęp: 08.04.2014].
View in Google Scholar
Kozieł, H., 2013, Reformy Orbána niewiele dały, http:// archiwum.rp.pl/artykul/1216988-Reformy-Orbána-niewiele-daly.html [dostęp: 10.04.2014].
View in Google Scholar
Központi Statisztikai Hivatal - KSH (Główny Urząd Statystyczny Węgier ) http://ksh.hu [dostęp: 09.04.2014].
View in Google Scholar
Molnar, M., 2012, Fiscal Consolidation: Part 5. What Factors Determine the Success of Consolidation Efforts?, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, no. 936, OECD Publishing.
View in Google Scholar
Perotti, R., 2011, The "Austerity Myth": Gain Without Pain?, NBER Working Paper Series, WP 17571, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
von Hagen, J., Strauch, R., 2001, Fiscal Consolidations: Quality, Economic Conditions, and Success, Public Choice, vol. 109(3-4), s. 327-346.
View in Google Scholar
