Strategic Myopia - Methodological Issues of a Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18559/SOEP.2019.2.2Keywords:
Research methodology, Research process, LiteratureAbstract
This study outlines three issues typical for the first step in any systematic literature review process: delimitation, selection and abundance. The meaning and consequences of each issue are explained. With the example of a systematic literature review on strategic myopia the process is commented on in detail, and solutions to each of the issues are proposed.
Downloads
References
Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 586-612.
View in Google Scholar
Anello, C. i Fleiss, J. L. (1995). Exploratory or analytic meta-analysis: should we distinguish between them?. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 48(1), 109-116.
View in Google Scholar
Apanowicz, J. (2002). Metodologia ogólna. Gdynia: Wyższa Szkoła Administracji i Biznesu.
View in Google Scholar
Benzies, K. M., Premji, S., Hayden, K. A. i Serrett, K. (2006). State of the evidence reviews: Advantages and challenges of including grey literature. Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing, 3(2), 55-61.
View in Google Scholar
Bramer, W. M., Rethlefsen, M. L., Kleijnen, J. i Franco, O. H. (2017). Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Systematic Reviews, 6(1), 245.
View in Google Scholar
Bullis, D. i Smith, L. (2011). Looking back, moving forward in the digital age: A re-view of the collection management and development literature, 2004-8. University Libraries Faculty Scholarship, 26.
View in Google Scholar
Columb, M. O. i Lalkhen, A. G. (2005). Systematic reviews & meta-analyses. Current Anaesthesia & Critical Care, 16(6), 391-394.
View in Google Scholar
Conn, V. S., Valentine, J. C., Cooper, H. M. i Rantz, M. J. (2003), Grey literature in meta-analyses. Nursing Research, 52(4), 256-261.
View in Google Scholar
Czakon, W. (2011). Metodyka systematycznego przeglądu literatury. Przegląd Organizacji, 3, 57-61.
View in Google Scholar
Gimenez, C. i Tachizawa, E. (2012). Extending sustainability to suppliers: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal,17(5), 531-543.
View in Google Scholar
Green, S. (2005). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Singapore Medical Journal, 46(6), 270-273.
View in Google Scholar
Gur, F. A. i Greckhamer, T. (2018). Know thy enemy: A review and agenda for re-search on competitor identification. Journal of Management, 45(5), 2072-2100.
View in Google Scholar
Haddaway, N. R., Collins, A. M., Coughlin, D. i Kirk, S. (2015). The role of Google Scholar in evidence reviews and its applicability to grey literature searching. PloS One, 10(9).
View in Google Scholar
King, W. R. i He, J. (2005). Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16(1), 32, 665-686.
View in Google Scholar
Klimas, P. (2011), Bliskość organizacyjna - krytyczny przegląd literatury źródłem inspiracji badawczej. W: J. Pyka. (red.), Nowoczesność przemysłu i usług. Dynamika zmian w polskim przemyśle i usługach (s. 169-184). Katowice: TNOiK.
View in Google Scholar
Levitt, T. (1960). Marketing myopia. Harvard Business Review, 38, 24-47, July - August.
View in Google Scholar
Levy, Y. i Ellis, T. J. (2006). A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science Journal, 9, 181-212.
View in Google Scholar
Machi, L. A. i McEvoy, B. T. (2016). The literature review: Six steps to success. CA: Corwin Press.
View in Google Scholar
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Best evidence synthesis: an intelligent alternative to meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 48(1), 9-18.
View in Google Scholar
Stańczyk, S. (2015). Triangulacja - łączenie metod badawczych i urzetelnienie badań. W: W. Czakon (red.), Podstawy metodologii badań w naukach o zarządzaniu (s. 128-140). Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer Business.
View in Google Scholar
Tsai, W. i Wu, C. H. (2010). Knowledge combination: A cocitation analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 441-450.
View in Google Scholar
