The Twofold Nature of Spontaneous Actions: Insights from Practice Turn in Management

Authors

  • Zofia Patora-Wysocka University of Social Scienc

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18559/SOEP.2016.5.11

Keywords:

Management, Entrepreneurship

Abstract

The aim of the article is to explore the twofold nature of spontaneous actions in management. The thesis posits that spontaneity is an important category initiating changes in an enterprise in the course of reproduced practices. Research methods included an in-depth interview and non-participatory observations. The issue of spontaneity can be perceived through the aspect of daily routines as well as from the opportunistic perspective. Business practices constitute some institutional schemas that are recreated on a daily basis. The kind of institution determines the way entrepreneurs cope with the shifting logics of everyday business life. Therefore they recreate practices spontaneously and not in a discursive manner. On the other hand spontaneous actions may imply grasping opportunities. This is particularly important when an organisation operates in a turbulent market. The findings confirm the dual character of spontaneous activities in the everyday practice of enterprises. Unplanned processes may integrate and strengthen routines that are very important elements of "emerging" perpetuation in an enterprise. They are stimuli to innovation and the adoption of new practices. This processual perspective referring to management practices offers a new framework for an analysis of change and entrepreneurial practice in management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beck, A.T., 1976, Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders, New Ameri- can Library, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Eccles, R.G., Nohria, N., Berkley, J.D., 1992, Beyond the Hype, Harvard Business Scholl Press Boston, MA.
View in Google Scholar

Feldman, M.S., Pentland, B., 2003, Retheorizing Organizational Routines As a Source of Flexibility and Change , Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 48, no. 1, p. 94-118.
View in Google Scholar

Garud, R., Simpson, B., Langley, A., Tsoukas, H. (eds.), 2015, The Emergence of Novelty in Organizations , Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Gherardi, S., 2012, How to Conduct a Practice - based Study Problems and Methods, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
View in Google Scholar

Giddens, A., 1984, The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, California University Press, Berkeley.
View in Google Scholar

Hernes, T., 2014, A Process Theory of Organization, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Jarzabkowski, P., 2005, Strategy as Practice. An Activity Based Approach, SAGE Strategy Series, London.
View in Google Scholar

Knights, D., 1997, Organization Theory in the Age of Deconstruction: Dualism, Gender and Postmodernism Revisited, Organization Studies, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 1-19.
View in Google Scholar

Lawrence, T., Suddaby, B., Leca, R.B., 2009, Institutional Work: Actors and Agency in Institutional Studies of Organizations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

Lazaric, N., 2010, Routines and Routinization : an Exploration of Some Micro-cognitive Foundations,in: Becker, M.C. (ed.), Hanbook of Organizational Routines, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Northampton, p. 205-227.
View in Google Scholar

Nicolini, D., 2012, Practice Theory, Work, and Organization. An Introduction, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W., 1996, Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , Information Systems Research, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 63-92.
View in Google Scholar

Orlikowski, W., 2000, Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations, Organization Science, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 404-428.
View in Google Scholar

Patora-Wysocka, Z., 2014, The Institutionalization of Spontaneous Changes in Enterprises: a Processual Perspective. Contemporary Management Quarterly, The Journal of scientific community and business leaders, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 41-52.
View in Google Scholar

Patora-Wysocka, Z., 2015a, Spontaneous Action and Everyday Practice in the Fashion Business, FIBRES & TEXTILES in Eastern Europe, vol. 23, no. 4(112), p. 8-13.
View in Google Scholar

Patora-Wysocka, Z., 2015b, Instytucjonalizacja zmian spontanicznych w procesie umiędzynaradawiania przedsiębiorstw, Problemy Zarządzania, accepted for publication.
View in Google Scholar

Polanyi, M., 1958, Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
View in Google Scholar

Reckwitz, A., 2002, Toward a Theory of Social Practices: a Developmet in Culturalist Theorizing, European Journal of Social Theory,vol. 5, no. 2, p. 243-263.
View in Google Scholar

Sawyer, R.K., 2015, How Organizational Innovation Emerges through Improvisational Processes,in: Garud, R., Simpson, B., Langley, A., Tsoukas, H. (eds.), The Emergence of Novelty in Organizations, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Schatzki, T.R., 2002, The Site of the Social : A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA.
View in Google Scholar

Schatzki, T.R., Cetina, K.K., Von Savigny, E., 2005, The Practice Turn in Contemporary, Routledge, London.
View in Google Scholar

Schau, H.J., Muñiz Jr., A.M., Arnould, E.J., 2009, How Brand Community Practices Create Value, Journal of Marketing, vol. 73, p. 30-51.
View in Google Scholar

Scott, W.R., 2008, Institutions and Organizations. Ideas and Interest, 3rd ed., Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
View in Google Scholar

Selznik, P., 1996, Institutionalism "Old " and "New", Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 41, no. 2, p. 270-277.
View in Google Scholar

Shotter, J., Tsoukas, H., 2011, Theory as Therapy: Wittgensteinian Reminders for Reflective Theorizing in Organization and Management Theory, Research in the Sociology of Organizations,vol. 02, no. 32, p. 311-342.
View in Google Scholar

Shove, E., Pantazar, M., Watson, M., 2012, The Dynamics of Social Practice, SAGE Publications, London.
View in Google Scholar

Sułkowski, Ł., 2012, Epistemologia i metodologia zarządzania, PWE, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Tokarski, J. (ed.), 1980, Słownik wyrazów obcych, PWN, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H., 2010, Practice, Strategy Making and Intentionality: a Heideggerian On- to-epistemology for Strategy as Practice, in: Golsorkhi, D. et al., Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p. 47-62.
View in Google Scholar

Tsoukas, H., Chia, R., 2002, On Organizational Becoming: Rethinking Organizational Change, Organization Science, vol. 13, no. 5, p. 567-582.
View in Google Scholar

Weick, K., 1979, The Social Psychology of Organising, Reading, Mass, Addison-Wesley.
View in Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L.,1979, On Certainty, Blackwell, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Yanow, D.,, 2015, After Mastery: Insights from Practice Theorizing, in: Garud, R., Simpson, B., Langley, A., Tsoukas, H. (eds.), The Emergence of Novelty in Organizations, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2016-05-31

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Patora-Wysocka, Z. (2016). The Twofold Nature of Spontaneous Actions: Insights from Practice Turn in Management. Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, 4(5), 184-198. https://doi.org/10.18559/SOEP.2016.5.11