Empirical study of "twin deficits" for the case of Senegal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18559/rielf.2022.2.8Keywords:
Ricardian neutrality hypothesis, twin deficits, budget deficit, current account deficitAbstract
This article is concerned with the verification of the Ricardian neutrality hypothesis in Sénégal, by the existence or not of the phenomenon of "twin deficits". The objective of this work was to study the correlation between the budget deficit and the current account deficit. The review of the theoretical literature focuses on Ricardian and conventional (classical and Keynesian) equivalence approaches dealing with the effects of public debt on the real economy. The review of the empirical literature made it possible to review certain applications by country or panel data to confirm or refute the hypothesis of neutrality by verifying the existence or not of the phenomenon of twin deficits. Thus, the methodological approach that we adopted is the cointegration test of the two variables through the use of the error correction model (ERM) according to the method of Engle and Granger (1987). Our results indicate an absence of cointegration between the budget deficit and current account balance variables and therefore an equilibrium relationship over the period studied, between these two variables, hence acceptance of the Ricardian Equivalence Proposal for the period 1991-2020. Also, this result is identified with the verification of the Ricardian Equivalence Proposal (PER) for Sénégal.
Downloads
References
Ahmed, S., & Ansari, M. I. (1994). A tale of two deficits: An empirical investigation for Canada. International Trade Journal, 8(4), 483–503.
View in Google Scholar
Ajili, W. (2007). The twin deficits: Are they really twins? An empirical investigation in the case of a small developing economy. Journal of Applied Economics, (1), 42–73.
View in Google Scholar
Anoruo, E., & Ramchander, S. (1998). Current account and fiscal deficits: Evidence from five developing economies of Asia. Journal of Asian Economics, 9(3), 487–501.
View in Google Scholar
Afonso, A., Huart, F., Jalles, J. T., & Stanek, P. (2022). Twin deficits revisited: A role for fiscal institutions?. Journal of International Money and Finance, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2021.102506
View in Google Scholar
Barro, R. (1974). Are government bonds net wealth?. Journal of Political Economy, 82(6), 1095–1117.
View in Google Scholar
Barro, R. (1976). Perceived wealth in bonds and social security and the Ricardian Equivalence Theorem: Reply to Feldstein and Buchanan. Journal of Political Economy, 84(2), 343–350.
View in Google Scholar
Elmendorf, D. W., & Mankiw, N. G. (1998). Government debt. NBER Working Paper, 6470.
View in Google Scholar
Enders, W., & Lee, B. (1990). Current account and budget deficits: Twins or distant cousins?. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(3), 373–381.
View in Google Scholar
Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276.
View in Google Scholar
Fidrmuc, J. (2003). The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle and twin deficits in selected countries. Economic Change and Restructuring, 36(2), 135–152. https://econpapers.repec.org/article/kapecopln/v_3a36_3ay_3a2003_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a135-152.htm
View in Google Scholar
Fleming, J. M. (1962). Domestic financial policies under fixed and under floating exchange rates. IMF Staff Papers, 9(3).
View in Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1957). The permanent income hypothesis. In M. Friedman (Ed.), A theory of the consumption function (pp. 20–37). National Bureau of Economic Research.
View in Google Scholar
Hatemi, A., & Shukur, G. (2002). Multivariate-based causality tests of twin deficits in the US. Journal of Applied Statistics, 29(6), 817–824.
View in Google Scholar
Islam, F. (1998). Brazil’s twin deficits: An empirical examination. Atlantic Economic Journal, 26(2), 121–128.
View in Google Scholar
Kasibhatla, K. M., Johnson, M. N., Malindretos, J., & Arize, A. C. (2001). Twin deficits revisited. Journal of Business & Economic Studies, 7(22), 52–63.
View in Google Scholar
Kaufmann, S., Winckler, G., & Scharler, J. (2002). The Austrian current account deficits: Driven by twin deficits or by intertemporal expenditure allocation?. Empirical Economics, 27(3), 539–542.
View in Google Scholar
Kouassi, E., Mougoué, M., & Kymn, K. O. (2004). Causality tests of the relationship between the twin deficits. Empirical Economics, 29(3), 503–525.
View in Google Scholar
Kulkarni, K. G., & Erickson, E. (2001). Twin deficit revisited: Evidence from India, Pakistan and Mexico. Journal of Applied Business Research, 17(2), 97–104.
View in Google Scholar
Leachman, L., & Francis, B. (2002). Twin deficits: Apparition or reality. Applied Economics, 34, 1121–1132.
View in Google Scholar
Modigliani, F., & Miller, M. H. (1958). The cost of capital, corporate finance and the theory of investment. American Economic Review, 48, 261–297.
View in Google Scholar
Myers S. C., & Majlluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, 187–221.
View in Google Scholar
Rahman, M., & Mishra, B. (1992). Cointegration of US Budget and current account deficits: Twins or strangers?. Journal of Economics and Finance, 16, 119–127.
View in Google Scholar
Vamvoukas, G. (1997). Have large budget deficits caused increasing trade deficits? Evidence from a developing country. Atlantic Economic Journal, 25(1), 80–90.
View in Google Scholar
Winner, L. (1993). The relationship of the current account balance and the budget balance. The American Economist, 37(2), 78–84.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Poznań University of Economics and Business
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
