Network dynamics : Heterogeneity, rationality and inertia

Authors

Keywords:

network externality, informational externality, technology adoption, incomplete information, inertia, heterogeneity

Abstract

Revisiting the work of Farrell and Saloner (1985, 1986) on the processes of technological adoption or choice of standard, this article analyzes the problems related to the timing of decisions and deepens the study of the inertia effect in these situations. We focus our analysis on the interaction of network effects and informational externalities to show that the information revelation, through its backward and forward effects, can in some cases eliminate inefficient inertia while all the literature on networks has mostly focused on the bandwagon effects systematically giving rise to momentum behaviors or more oftenly excessive inertia. In an incomplete information framework on agent preferences, we add to our model the possibility of a transitional incompatibility situation as well as any switching cost situation in such a way as to examine without bias and completely the impact of the dissemination of information on the adoption decisions of agents. Finally, some of our results on equilibrium strategies and optimality can be reinterpreted from the point of view of the heterogeneity of the population, in terms of preferences or ability to process information. Some types of agents that do not react to their environment will lead to a bias in the decisions of sophisticated agents and influence in a « disproportionate » way the result and the optimality of the game.

References

Choi, J. (1997, autumn). Herd behavior, penguin effect and the suppression of informational diffusion: An analysis of informational externalities and payoff interdependency. Rand Journal of Economics, 28(3), 407-425.
View in Google Scholar

David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75(2), 332-337.
View in Google Scholar

Dybvig, P., & Spatt, C. (1983). Adoption externalities as public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 20, 231-247.
View in Google Scholar

Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1985, spring). Standardization, compatibility, and innovation. Rand Journal of Economics, 16(1), 70-83.
View in Google Scholar

Farrell, J., & Saloner, G. (1986). Installed base and compatibility: Innovation, product pre- announcements, and predation. American Economic Review, 76(5), 940-955.
View in Google Scholar

Gale, D. (1995). Dynamic coordination games. Economic Theory, 5, 1-18.
View in Google Scholar

Haltiwanger, J., & Waldman, M. (1985). Rational expectations and the limits of rationality: An analysis of heterogeneity. American Economic Review, 75(3), 326-340.
View in Google Scholar

Haltiwanger, J., & Waldman, M. (1991). Responders versus non-responders: A new per- spective on heterogeneity. The Economic Journal, 101, 1085-1102.
View in Google Scholar

Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1990). The fable of the keys. Journal of Law and Economics, 33(1), 1-26.
View in Google Scholar

Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1994). Network externality: An uncommon tragedy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 133-150.
View in Google Scholar

Lopatka, J. E., & Page, W. H. (1995, summer). Microsoft, monopolization, and network externalities: Some uses and abuses of economic theory in antitrust decision making. The Antitrust Bulletin, 317-370.
View in Google Scholar

Malin, E. (2017). Endogenous timing and intensity of inertia in a bandwagon equilibrium. (Working Paper CREM, No. 2017-18).
View in Google Scholar

Rohlfs, J. (2001). Bandwagon effects in high-technology industries. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
View in Google Scholar

Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. (1998). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Press.
View in Google Scholar

Published

2020-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles