Family Tax Relief in Poland in Comparision to Selected Countries

Authors

  • Magda Wiśniewska-Kuźma University of Bialystok

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18559/SOEP.2018.11.2

Keywords:

Women's fertility, Family policy, Tax incentives, Family, Pro-family policy

Abstract


As a response to today's demographic problems, which have adverse effects on the public finance system, a number of measures are being taken as part of a pro-family policy. The fiscal policy tools are its key element, such as direct benefits from the state budget and public expenditures carried out with the use of special tax structures (so-called tax expenditures), which include a family tax relief for personal income tax, operating in Poland since 2007. It has undergone numerous changes aimed at strengthening its redistributive character and supporting low-income taxpayers. This paper reviews the key changes in the construction of relief over years. The author has set out a research goal to estimate the level of savings in income tax due to family tax relief and their importance in the budget of the household receiving income in the amount of the average wage in the economy and presenting it in comparison with other countries representing different economic models and thus applying different principles of pro-family and fiscal policies. The research hypothesis assumes a relatively high significance of savings for family tax relief in Polish households compared to other countries using this type of support, despite the lower amount of relief from the central value in the surveyed group. The verification was carried out using comparative analysis of indicators developed by the author.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azmat, G. i Gonzalez, L. (2010). Targeting fertility and female participation through the income tax. Labour Economics, 17(3), 487-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2009.09.006.
View in Google Scholar

Barro, R. i Becker, G. (1989). Fertility choice in a model of economic growth. Econometrica. Econometric Society, 57(2), 481-501. Pobrane z https://www.jstor.org/stable/1912563?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
View in Google Scholar

Baughman, R. i Dickert-Conlin, S. (2006). The earned income tax credit and fertility. Journal of Population Economics, 22(3), 537-563. Pobrane z https://msu.edu/~dickertc/EITCFert_JPopE3.pdf.
View in Google Scholar

Brewer, M., Ratcliffe, A. i Smith, A. (2010). Does welfare reform affect fertility? Evidence from the UK. Journal of Population Economics 25(1), 245-266. Pobrane z http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/cmpo/migrated/documents/wp177.pdf.
View in Google Scholar

Department of the Treasury International Revenue Service. (2017). Child and depend care epenses. For use in preparing 2017 return. Pobrane z https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p503.pdf.
View in Google Scholar

Gauthier, A. (2002). Family policies in industrialized countries: Is there convergence? Population, 57 (3), 447-474. doi: 10.2307/3246635.
View in Google Scholar

Hybka, M. M. (2014). Konsekwencje fiskalne ulg w podatku dochodowym od osób fizycznych w Niemczech. Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, 2/6 (267), 208- 222. Pobrane z http://soep.ue.poznan.pl/jdownloads/Wszystkie%20numery/Rok%202014/12_hybka.pdf.
View in Google Scholar

Hybka, M. M. (2016). Federalne podatki dochodowe w Stanach Zjednoczonych Ameryki - konstrukcja prawna i znaczenie fiskalne. Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, 4(4), 7-22. doi: 10.18559/SOEP.2016.4.1.
View in Google Scholar

Levy, H., Morawski, L. i Myck, M. (2009). Alternatywne rozwiązania podatkowo- zasiłkowe wspierające rodziny z dziećmi. Bank i Kredyt, 4 (40), 1027-1062. Pobrane z http://bankikredyt.nbp.pl/home.aspx?f=/content/2009/04/bik_04_2009_pl.Html.
View in Google Scholar

Małecka-Ziembińska, E. (2016). Prawne, fiskalne i prorodzinne aspekty podatkowej ulgi z tytułu wychowywania dzieci. Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, 4(4), 23-37. doi: 10.18559/SOEP.2016.4.2.
View in Google Scholar

Ministerstwo Finansów (2007-2016). Informacja dotycząca rozliczenia podatku dochodowego od osób fizycznych. Warszawa: Ministerstwo Gospodarki. Pobrane z https://www.finanse.mf.gov.pl/pit/statystyki/-/document_library_display/8Wpj/view/6084784.
View in Google Scholar

Oręziak, L. (2007). Konkurencja podatkowa w ramach Unii Europejskie., Implikacje dla Polski. Warszawa: Oficyna Wydawnicza Wyższej Szkoły Handlu i Prawa im. Ryszarda Łazarskiego.
View in Google Scholar

Reibstein, L. (2017). The impact of public policy on fertility rates in OECD countries: A compartive study. LUP Student Papers Lund University Libraries. Pobrane z: https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/search/publication/8918310.
View in Google Scholar

Ślesicka, A. (2009). Ulga podatkowa na wychowanie dzieci. Biuro Analiz Sejmowych, Infos 5(52). Pobrane z http://orka.sejm.gov.pl/WydBAS.nsf/0/C6145646BBB-35812C125756E0034AD40/$file/Infos_52.pdf.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2018-11-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wiśniewska-Kuźma, M. (2018). Family Tax Relief in Poland in Comparision to Selected Countries. Studia Oeconomica Posnaniensia, 6(11), 20-42. https://doi.org/10.18559/SOEP.2018.11.2