Heterogeneity of the Okun's Law Coefficients across developed countries : Empirical evidence on nonlinear influence of the technological gap

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18559/rielf.2020.1.4

Keywords:

unemployment rate, Okun’s Law, technological gap, labour hoarding, interaction model, threshold model

Abstract

The magnitude of short run variations in unemployment induced by output shocks is influenced, interalia, by a variety of supply-side characteristics of the economy in question. This paper argues that one important element of those characteristics is a country ' s 'distance ' from the technological frontier. Using both, a panel interaction model and a panel threshold model, we show that the value of the coefficient linking short run variations in unemployment to output changes (often known as the Okun ' s Law Coefficient) is influenced by the technological distance of a country to the world efficiency frontier. Specifically, the larger the distance to the frontier, the larger the impact of real GDP movements on unemployment rate variations. Moreover, the magnitude of this impact is both considerable and exhibits wide variation between countries; decomposition of the total derivatives of unemployment with respect to GDP shows that the technology-induced share of this derivative is around 20% for Norway and Denmark countries (close to the frontier) and around 40% for Greece (which has the largest technological gap). Traditional growth enhancing demand side policies should thus go in hand with adequate supply side policies in order to stabilise or reduce the unemployment rate in technologically advanced countries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., & Zilibotti, F. (2006). Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(1), 37-74.
View in Google Scholar

Adanu, K. (2005). A cross-province comparison of Okun’s coefficient for Canada. Applied Economics, 37(5), 561-570.
View in Google Scholar

Ball, L., Leigh, D., & Loungani, P. (2012, 8-9 novembre). Okun’s Law: Fit at 50?. 13th Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference.
View in Google Scholar

Ball L., Leigh, D., & Loungani, P. (2013, janvier). Okun’s Law: Fit at 50?. (IMF Working Paper, IMF Research Department).
View in Google Scholar

Crespo-Cuaresma, J. (2003). Revisiting Okun’s Law: A piecewise-linear approach. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65, 439-451.
View in Google Scholar

Duernecker, G. (2008). Technology adoption, turbulence and the dynamics of unemployment. (Working Paper European University Institute No. 2008/10).
View in Google Scholar

Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1985). The measurement of efficiency production. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
View in Google Scholar

Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84(1), 66-83.
View in Google Scholar

Freeman, D. (2001). Panel tests of Okun’s Law for ten industrial countries. Economic In- quiry, 39(4), 511-523.
View in Google Scholar

Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
View in Google Scholar

Guisinger, A. Y., Hernández-Murillo, R., Owyang, M. T., & Sinclair, T. M. (2015). A state-level analysis of Okun’s Law. (Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis, Working Paper 2015-029P, 40).
View in Google Scholar

Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93, 334-368.
View in Google Scholar

Harris, R., & Silverstone, B. (2001). Testing for asymmetry in Okun’s Law: A cross-country comparison. Economics Bulletin, 5, 1-13.
View in Google Scholar

Herwartz, H., & Niebuhr, A. (2011). Growth, unemployment and labour market institutions: Evidence from a cross-section of EU regions. Applied Economics, 43, 4663-4676.
View in Google Scholar

Hodrick, R. J., & Prescott, E. C. (1997). Postwar U.S. business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 29, 1-16.
View in Google Scholar

Hoon, H. T., Ho, K. W. (2007). Distance to frontier and the big swings of the unemployment rate. What room is left for monetary policy?. (Kiel Working Paper No. 1347).
View in Google Scholar

Huang, H. C., & Lin, S. C. (2008). Smooth-time-varying Okun’s coefficient. Economic Modelling, 25, 363-375.
View in Google Scholar

IMF. (2010). Unemployment dynamics during recessions and recoveries: Okun’s Law and beyond. In World Economic Outlook: Rebalancing growth (chapitre 3). Washington: IMF.
View in Google Scholar

Jorgenson, D. W., & Stiroh, K. J. (2000). Raising the speed limit: US economic Growth in the information age. (OECD Economic Department Working Papers, No. 261, 78).
View in Google Scholar

Kaufman, R. T. (1988). An international comparison of Okun’s Laws. Journal of Compara- tive Economics, 12(2), 82-203.
View in Google Scholar

Knotek, E. (2007). How useful is Okun’s Law?. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, 73-103.
View in Google Scholar

Lee, J. (2000). The robustness of Okun’s law: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Macroeconomics, 22(2), 331-356.
View in Google Scholar

Malley, J., & Molana, H. (2008). Output, unemployment and Okun’s Law: Some evidence from the G7. Economic Letters, 101, 113-115.
View in Google Scholar

Moosa, I. A. (1997). A cross-country comparison of Okun’s coefficient. Journal of Comparative Economics, 24, 335-356.
View in Google Scholar

Okun, A. M. (1962). Potential GNP: Its measurement and significance. In Proceedings of the Business and Economics Statistics Section (98-104). Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.
View in Google Scholar

Oliner, S. D., & Sichel, D. E. (2000). The resurgence of growth in the late 1990s: Is information technology the story?. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 1-48.
View in Google Scholar

Owyang, M. T., Sekhposyan, T., & Vermann, K. (2013, October 1). Output and unemployment. How do they relate today?. The Regional Economist, 5-9.
View in Google Scholar

Silvapulle, P., Moosa, I. A., & Silvapulle, M. J. (2004). Asymmetry in Okun’s Law. Canadian Journal of Economics, 37, 353-374.
View in Google Scholar

Tavera, C., & Perman, R. (2005). A cross country analysis of the Okun’s Law coefficient convergence in Europe. Applied Economics, 37, 2501-2513.
View in Google Scholar

Van Ark, B. V., Inklaar, R., & McGuckin, R. (2002). Changing gear: Productivity, ICT and services. Groningen Growth and Development Center, Research Memorandum GD-60, 1-79.
View in Google Scholar

Vandenbussche, J., Aghion, P., & Meghir, C. (2006). Growth, distance to frontier and composition of human capital. Journal of Economic Growth, 11(2), 97-127.
View in Google Scholar

Villaverde, J., & Maza, A. (2009). The robustness of Okun’s Law in Spain, 1980-2004: Regional evidence. Journal of Policy Modelling, 31(2), 289-297.
View in Google Scholar

Virèn, M. (2001). The Okun curve is non-linear. Economics Letters, 70, 253-257.
View in Google Scholar

Weber, C. E. (1995). Cyclical output, cyclical unemployment, and Okun’s coefficient: A new approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10, 433-445.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Boussemart, J.-P., Briec, W., Perman, R., & Tavera, C. (2020). Heterogeneity of the Okun’s Law Coefficients across developed countries : Empirical evidence on nonlinear influence of the technological gap. La Revue Internationale Des Économistes De Langue Française, 5(1), 78-99. https://doi.org/10.18559/rielf.2020.1.4

Similar Articles

31-40 of 203

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.