‘Hybrid ’ competition, innovation outcomes and regulation: A duopoly model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18559/rielf.2020.1.10Keywords:
firm, community, closed innovation, open innovation, appropriationAbstract
This paper presents a duopoly model in which a commercial organization and a community compete by providing digital products while being able to share their innovation outputs to develop their own activities. The commercial organization always benefits from either a 'closed ' or an 'open ' institutional regime shift. Our numerical analysis evidences that the 'closed ' shift provides the best levels of innovation and welfare whereas it is not found to be profit-improving when product differentiation is small. This result partially qualifies the conventional idea according to which public policies may be designed to defend commercial interests rather than public ones.
Downloads
References
Belleflamme, P., & Peitz, M. (2010). Digital piracy: Theory. (CORE Discussion Paper No. 2010/60).
View in Google Scholar
Bonaccorsi, A., Giannangeli, S., & Rossi, C. (2006). Entry strategies under competing standards: Hybrid business models in the open source software industry. Management Science, 52(7), 1085-1098.
View in Google Scholar
Chellappa, R. K., & Shivendu, S. (2005). Managing piracy: Pricing and sampling strategies for digital experience goods in vertically segmented markets. Information Systems Research, 16(4), 400-417.
View in Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H. W. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
View in Google Scholar
Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
View in Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, C., & Jacquemin, A. (1988). Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in du- opoly with spillovers. American Economic Review, 78, 1133-1137.
View in Google Scholar
D’Aspremont, C., & Jacquemin, A. (1990). Cooperative and non-cooperative R&D in du- opoly with spillovers: Erratum. American Economic Review, 80, 641-642.
View in Google Scholar
David, P. A. (1998). Common agency contracting and the emergence of ‘open science’ institutions. American Economic Review, 88(2), 15-21.
View in Google Scholar
David, P. A. (2004). Understanding the emergence of ‘open science’ institutions: Functionalist economics in historical context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 571-589.
View in Google Scholar
Economides, N., & Katsamakas, E. (2006). Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry. Management Science, 52(7), 1057-1071.
View in Google Scholar
Fershtman, C., & Kamien, M. L. (1992). Cross-licensing of complementary technologies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10(3), 329-348.
View in Google Scholar
Flowers, S. (2008). Harnessing the hackers: The emergence and exploitation of outlaw innovation. Research Policy, 37(2), 177-193.
View in Google Scholar
Grand, S., Krogh, G. von, Leonard, D., & Swap, W. (2004). Resource allocation beyond firm boundaries: A multi-level model for open source innovation. Long Range Planning, 37(6), 591-610.
View in Google Scholar
Hui, K. L., & Png, I. (2003). Piracy and the legitimate demand for recorded music. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 2(1), 1-11.
View in Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
View in Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 77(3), 297-306.
View in Google Scholar
Nelson, R. R. (2004). The market economy, and the scientific commons. Research Policy, 33(3), 455-471.
View in Google Scholar
Pastor, M., & Sandonis, J. (2002). Research joint ventures vs. cross licensing agreements: An agency approach. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20(2), 215-249.
View in Google Scholar
Peitz, M., & Waelbroeck, P. (2006). Piracy of digital products: A critical review of the theoretical literature. Information Economics and Policy, 18(4), 449-476.
View in Google Scholar
Rossi, M. A. (2006). Decoding the free/open source software puzzle. In J. Bitzer, P. J. H. Schröder (Eds.), The economics of open source software development (pp. 15-55). Oxford: Elsevier.
View in Google Scholar
Schulz, C., & Wagner, S. (2008). Outlaw community innovations. International Journal of Innovation Management, 12(3), 399-418.
View in Google Scholar
Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1998). Information rules: A strategic guide to the network economy. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.
View in Google Scholar
Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. New York: William Morrow and Co.
View in Google Scholar
Varian, H. R. (2000). Buying, sharing and renting information goods. Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(4), 473-488.
View in Google Scholar
von Hippel, E. (1986). Lead users: A source of novel product concepts. Management Science, 32(7), 791-805.
View in Google Scholar
von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press. von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Poznań University of Economics and Business
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
