Fiscal consolidation : What differences between shock therapy and soft adjustment?
Keywords:
fiscal consolidation, macroeconomics, narrative approachAbstract
After easing fiscal policies during the economic crisis, many countries faced a rising public debt and most of them have launched fiscal consolidation plans to stabilize and reduce the public indebtedness in order to restore the sustainability of the public finances. Two different strategies can be followed by policymakers to achieve this goal. The first approach is a shock therapy that would response to a financial emergency keeping away a potential default. A second approach smoothes the fiscal adjustment to limit contractionary effects. In this paper, we compare the macroeconomic effects of each strategy based on the narrative approach of the fiscal consolidations developed by the IMF rather than the conventional statistical measure (cyclically-adjusted primary balance: CAPB) measure. Both strategies show similar effects on the macroeconomic variables, but private demand would react stronger to the shock therapy strategy.
References
Alesina, A., & Ardagna, S. (2010). Large changes in fiscal policy: Taxes versus spending. (NBER Tax Policy and the Economy, 24, 35-68).
View in Google Scholar
Alesina, A., & Ardagna, S. (2013). The design of fiscal adjustments. (NBER Tax Policy and the Economy, 27, 19-67).
View in Google Scholar
Alesina, A., Ardagna, S., & Gali, J. (1998). Tales of fiscal adjustments. Economic Policy, 13(27), 487-545.
View in Google Scholar
Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Fiscal adjustments in OECD countries: Composition and macroeconomic effects. (NBER Working Papers No. 5730, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.).
View in Google Scholar
Auerbach A. J., & Gorodnichenko, Y. (2012a). Fiscal multipliers in recession and expansion. (NBER Working Paper No. 17447).
View in Google Scholar
Auerbach, A. J., & Gorodnichenko, Y. (2012b, mai). Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(2), 1-27.
View in Google Scholar
Batini, N., Callegari, G., & Melina, G. (2012). Successful austerity in the United States, Europe and Japan. (IMF Working Paper No. 12/190).
View in Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. (1993). Suggestions for a new set of fiscal indicators. Mimeo. doi:https://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/redir.pfu=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1787%2F435618162862;h=repec:oec:ecoaaa:79-en
View in Google Scholar
Blanchard, O., & Leigh, D. (2013). Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 103(3), 117-120.
View in Google Scholar
Coenen, G., Freedman, C., Furceri, D., Kumhof, M., Lalonde, R., Laxton, D., ... Veld, J. (2012). Effects of fiscal stimulus in structural models. American Economic Journal, 4(1), 22-68.
View in Google Scholar
Commission Européenne. (2007). Part IV ‒ Lessons from successful fiscal consolidations. European Economy Public Finances in EMU, 3, 203-238.
View in Google Scholar
Commission Européenne. (2012). Part III ‒ Consolidation and dynamics of the multipliers. Are there counter-intuitive effects?. European Economy Public Finances in EMU, 4, 113-162.
View in Google Scholar
Corsetti, G., Meier, A., & Müller, G. (2012). What determines government spending multipliers?. (CEPR Discussion Papers No. 9010).
View in Google Scholar
Devries, P., Guajardo, J., Leigh. D., & Pescatori, A. (2011). A new action-based dataset of fiscal consolidation. (IMF Working Paper, No. 11/128).
View in Google Scholar
Erceg Ch. J., & Lindé, J. (2012). Fiscal consolidation in an open economy. (Working paper Federal Reserve in International Finance Discussion Papers, No. 1046).
View in Google Scholar
Fazzari, S., Morley, J., & Panovska, I. (2015). State-dependent effects of fiscal policy. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 19(3), 285-215.
View in Google Scholar
Fonds Monétaire International (FMI). (2010, octobre). World Economic Outlook, chapitre 3.
View in Google Scholar
Giavazzi, F., & Pagano, M. (1990). Can severe fiscal contractions be expansionary? Tales of two small European countries. In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1990 (Vol. 5, pp. 75-122). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
View in Google Scholar
Guajardo, J., Leigh, D., & Pescatori, A. (2014). Expansionary austerity: New international evidence. Journal of European Economic Association, 12(4), 949-968,
View in Google Scholar
Hall, R. E. (2009). By how much does GDP rise if the government buys more output?. (NBER Working Papers, No. 1549).
View in Google Scholar
Morris, R., & Schucknecht, L. (2007). Structural balances and revenue windfalls: The role of asset prices revisited. (ECB Working Paper, No. 737).
View in Google Scholar
Ramey, V. A., & Shapiro, M. D. (1998). Costly capital reallocation and the effects of government spending. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 48(1), 145-194.
View in Google Scholar
Romer, C. D., & Romer, D. H. (2010). The macroeconomic effects of tax changes: Estimates based on a new measure of fiscal shocks. American Economic Review, 100(3), 763-801.
View in Google Scholar
Stehn, S. J., Hatzius J., Wilson, D., & Carlson, S. (2011, 19 août). The speed limit of fiscal consolidation. (Goldman Sachs Global Economic Paper, No. 207).
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Poznań University of Economics and Business
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
