Introduction to the Identity of Enterprise Staff
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18559/etgfrz19Keywords:
Human resources, Human Resources Management (HRM), Paradox, EnterprisesAbstract
The aim of this paper is to define, using the hypothetico-deductive method, the nature of people working in an action system, especially an enterprise. The current status of cognitive scientific knowledge in this area, as presented in the literature, is not completely satisfactory. Claims relate mainly to "human resource management" (labour; personnel; employees; human capital - choose as appropriate), without exploring, classifying or explaining their nature. Having reviewed current knowledge, I shall attempt to describe the nature of an action system by examining its various dimensions: a complex structure of aspirations (political, strategic); the core of an action system (founded on operational objectives and the processes serving those objectives); operational doctrines; operational circumstances; and rigid operational constraints. I further argue that the most crucial element of an action system is its acting subject, part of the action system core. In single-subject activities that subject is the human individual, a highly integrated entity. In multi-subject activities we are dealing with various entities and more complex human combinations. I claim that all the people working for an enterprise make up its Staff - entrepreneurs and investors, managers, employees and the self-employed. Each one of them in some way expends energy (i.e. works) for the enterprise and this constitutes, in every way, its success factor. However, the Staff is also a social construct, giving rise to problems relating to its identity and management. These problems can be solved; especially by resorting to the categories of paradox management, chaos management and dialectical management.
Downloads
References
Czajkowski, Z., 2012, Kapitał ludzki - pojęcie i miary, Prace i Materiały Instytutu Gospodarki Światowej, nr 312, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar
Fitz-enz, J., 2001, Rentowność inwestycji w kapitał ludzki, Oficyna Ekonomiczna, Dom Wydawniczy ABC, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar
Kotarbiński, T., 1965, Traktat o dobrej robocie, wyd. 3, Ossolineum, Wrocław - Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar
Kunasz, M., 2004, Teoria kapitału ludzkiego na tle dorobku myśli ekonomicznej, w: Manikowski, A., Psyk, A. (red.), Unifikacja gospodarek europejskich: szanse i zagrożenia, Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar
Łukasiewicz, G., 2009, Kapitał ludzki w organizacji. Pomiar i sprawozdawczość, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar
Pauli, W., 1946, Exclusion Principle and Quantum Mechanics, December 13, http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1945/pauli-lecture.pdf [dostęp: 15.12.2014].
View in Google Scholar
Ustawa z dnia 26 czerwca 1974 r. Kodeks pracy, Dz.U. nr 24, poz. 141, ze zm.
View in Google Scholar
Witczak, H., 2008a, Natura i kształtowanie systemu zarządzania przedsiębiorstwem, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar
Witczak H., 2008b, Problemy naukowe, w: Sławińska, M., Witczak, H. (red.), Podstawy metodologiczne prac doktorskich w naukach ekonomicznych, PWE, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar
Witczak H., 2008c, Zarządzanie zmianą - zmiana zarządzania, w: Zimniewicz, K. (red.), Zmiany w organizacji - przyczyny i konsekwencje, Zeszyty Naukowe nr 105, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej w Poznaniu, Poznań.
View in Google Scholar
Witczak, H., 2013, Wstęp do systemu nauk o zarządzaniu, Współczesne Zarządzanie, nr 2.
View in Google Scholar
Zarządzanie załogą, https://www.as-tech.pl/static,4,pl,,0 [dostęp: 15.12.2014].
View in Google Scholar
Zieleniewski, J., 1974, Organizacja zespołów ludzkich, PWN, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar
