Fiscal consolidation : What differences between shock therapy and soft adjustment?

Authors

  • Jean-Jacques Durand Université de Rennes, Faculté de sciences économiques, France
  • Guillaume L'oeillet Université de Rennes, Faculté de sciences économiques, France https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1996-9204

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18559/rielf.2020.1.3

Keywords:

fiscal consolidation, macroeconomics, narrative approach

Abstract

After easing fiscal policies during the economic crisis, many countries faced a rising public debt and most of them have launched fiscal consolidation plans to stabilize and reduce the public indebtedness in order to restore the sustainability of the public finances. Two different strategies can be followed by policymakers to achieve this goal. The first approach is a shock therapy that would response to a financial emergency keeping away a potential default. A second approach smoothes the fiscal adjustment to limit contractionary effects. In this paper, we compare the macroeconomic effects of each strategy based on the narrative approach of the fiscal consolidations developed by the IMF rather than the conventional statistical measure (cyclically-adjusted primary balance: CAPB) measure. Both strategies show similar effects on the macroeconomic variables, but private demand would react stronger to the shock therapy strategy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alesina, A., & Ardagna, S. (2010). Large changes in fiscal policy: Taxes versus spending. (NBER Tax Policy and the Economy, 24, 35-68).
View in Google Scholar

Alesina, A., & Ardagna, S. (2013). The design of fiscal adjustments. (NBER Tax Policy and the Economy, 27, 19-67).
View in Google Scholar

Alesina, A., Ardagna, S., & Gali, J. (1998). Tales of fiscal adjustments. Economic Policy, 13(27), 487-545.
View in Google Scholar

Alesina, A., & Perotti, R. (1996). Fiscal adjustments in OECD countries: Composition and macroeconomic effects. (NBER Working Papers No. 5730, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.).
View in Google Scholar

Auerbach A. J., & Gorodnichenko, Y. (2012a). Fiscal multipliers in recession and expansion. (NBER Working Paper No. 17447).
View in Google Scholar

Auerbach, A. J., & Gorodnichenko, Y. (2012b, mai). Measuring the output responses to fiscal policy. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4(2), 1-27.
View in Google Scholar

Batini, N., Callegari, G., & Melina, G. (2012). Successful austerity in the United States, Europe and Japan. (IMF Working Paper No. 12/190).
View in Google Scholar

Blanchard, O. (1993). Suggestions for a new set of fiscal indicators. Mimeo. doi:https://econpapers.repec.org/scripts/redir.pfu=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.1787%2F435618162862;h=repec:oec:ecoaaa:79-en
View in Google Scholar

Blanchard, O., & Leigh, D. (2013). Growth forecast errors and fiscal multipliers. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 103(3), 117-120.
View in Google Scholar

Coenen, G., Freedman, C., Furceri, D., Kumhof, M., Lalonde, R., Laxton, D., ... Veld, J. (2012). Effects of fiscal stimulus in structural models. American Economic Journal, 4(1), 22-68.
View in Google Scholar

Commission Européenne. (2007). Part IV ‒ Lessons from successful fiscal consolidations. European Economy Public Finances in EMU, 3, 203-238.
View in Google Scholar

Commission Européenne. (2012). Part III ‒ Consolidation and dynamics of the multipliers. Are there counter-intuitive effects?. European Economy Public Finances in EMU, 4, 113-162.
View in Google Scholar

Corsetti, G., Meier, A., & Müller, G. (2012). What determines government spending multipliers?. (CEPR Discussion Papers No. 9010).
View in Google Scholar

Devries, P., Guajardo, J., Leigh. D., & Pescatori, A. (2011). A new action-based dataset of fiscal consolidation. (IMF Working Paper, No. 11/128).
View in Google Scholar

Erceg Ch. J., & Lindé, J. (2012). Fiscal consolidation in an open economy. (Working paper Federal Reserve in International Finance Discussion Papers, No. 1046).
View in Google Scholar

Fazzari, S., Morley, J., & Panovska, I. (2015). State-dependent effects of fiscal policy. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 19(3), 285-215.
View in Google Scholar

Fonds Monétaire International (FMI). (2010, octobre). World Economic Outlook, chapitre 3.
View in Google Scholar

Giavazzi, F., & Pagano, M. (1990). Can severe fiscal contractions be expansionary? Tales of two small European countries. In NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1990 (Vol. 5, pp. 75-122). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
View in Google Scholar

Guajardo, J., Leigh, D., & Pescatori, A. (2014). Expansionary austerity: New international evidence. Journal of European Economic Association, 12(4), 949-968,
View in Google Scholar

Hall, R. E. (2009). By how much does GDP rise if the government buys more output?. (NBER Working Papers, No. 1549).
View in Google Scholar

Morris, R., & Schucknecht, L. (2007). Structural balances and revenue windfalls: The role of asset prices revisited. (ECB Working Paper, No. 737).
View in Google Scholar

Ramey, V. A., & Shapiro, M. D. (1998). Costly capital reallocation and the effects of government spending. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 48(1), 145-194.
View in Google Scholar

Romer, C. D., & Romer, D. H. (2010). The macroeconomic effects of tax changes: Estimates based on a new measure of fiscal shocks. American Economic Review, 100(3), 763-801.
View in Google Scholar

Stehn, S. J., Hatzius J., Wilson, D., & Carlson, S. (2011, 19 août). The speed limit of fiscal consolidation. (Goldman Sachs Global Economic Paper, No. 207).
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Durand, J.-J., & L'oeillet, G. (2020). Fiscal consolidation : What differences between shock therapy and soft adjustment?. La Revue Internationale Des Économistes De Langue Française, 5(1), 58-77. https://doi.org/10.18559/rielf.2020.1.3

Similar Articles

21-30 of 57

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.