Influence de la distance technologique sur le co efficient de la Loi d'Okun
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.18559/rielf.2020.1.4Mots-clés :
taux de chômage, Loi d’Okun, frontière technologique, écart technologique, modèle d’interaction, modèle à seuil, politique macroéconomiqueRésumé
Nous utilisons deux techniques de modélisation complémentaires pour analyser l ' influence de la distance technologique des pays sur la force de la relation entre les fluctuations de court terme de l ' activité et celles du taux de chômage dans la Loi d ' Okun. Il apparait que le coefficient d ' Okun est positivement corrélé avec la distance technologique des pays. Plus la distance technologique d ' un pays par rapport à la frontière mondiale est grande, plus l ' impact des variations de court terme du PIB sur les mouvements conjoncturels du taux de chômage est important. La décomposition de cet impact pour chaque pays de l ' échantillon montre que l ' effet de l ' écart technologique sur corrélation entre les mouvements du PIB réel et de ceux du taux de chômage varie entre les différents pays. Cet effet est par exemple proche de 20% pour le Danemark et la Norvège mais plutôt de l ' ordre de 40% pour la Grèce.
Téléchargements
Références
Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., & Zilibotti, F. (2006). Distance to frontier, selection, and economic growth. Journal of the European Economic Association, 4(1), 37-74.
View in Google Scholar
Adanu, K. (2005). A cross-province comparison of Okun’s coefficient for Canada. Applied Economics, 37(5), 561-570.
View in Google Scholar
Ball, L., Leigh, D., & Loungani, P. (2012, 8-9 novembre). Okun’s Law: Fit at 50?. 13th Jacques Polak Annual Research Conference.
View in Google Scholar
Ball L., Leigh, D., & Loungani, P. (2013, janvier). Okun’s Law: Fit at 50?. (IMF Working Paper, IMF Research Department).
View in Google Scholar
Crespo-Cuaresma, J. (2003). Revisiting Okun’s Law: A piecewise-linear approach. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65, 439-451.
View in Google Scholar
Duernecker, G. (2008). Technology adoption, turbulence and the dynamics of unemployment. (Working Paper European University Institute No. 2008/10).
View in Google Scholar
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. A. K. (1985). The measurement of efficiency production. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
View in Google Scholar
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. American Economic Review, 84(1), 66-83.
View in Google Scholar
Freeman, D. (2001). Panel tests of Okun’s Law for ten industrial countries. Economic In- quiry, 39(4), 511-523.
View in Google Scholar
Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
View in Google Scholar
Guisinger, A. Y., Hernández-Murillo, R., Owyang, M. T., & Sinclair, T. M. (2015). A state-level analysis of Okun’s Law. (Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis, Working Paper 2015-029P, 40).
View in Google Scholar
Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93, 334-368.
View in Google Scholar
Harris, R., & Silverstone, B. (2001). Testing for asymmetry in Okun’s Law: A cross-country comparison. Economics Bulletin, 5, 1-13.
View in Google Scholar
Herwartz, H., & Niebuhr, A. (2011). Growth, unemployment and labour market institutions: Evidence from a cross-section of EU regions. Applied Economics, 43, 4663-4676.
View in Google Scholar
Hodrick, R. J., & Prescott, E. C. (1997). Postwar U.S. business cycles: An empirical investigation. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 29, 1-16.
View in Google Scholar
Hoon, H. T., Ho, K. W. (2007). Distance to frontier and the big swings of the unemployment rate. What room is left for monetary policy?. (Kiel Working Paper No. 1347).
View in Google Scholar
Huang, H. C., & Lin, S. C. (2008). Smooth-time-varying Okun’s coefficient. Economic Modelling, 25, 363-375.
View in Google Scholar
IMF. (2010). Unemployment dynamics during recessions and recoveries: Okun’s Law and beyond. In World Economic Outlook: Rebalancing growth (chapitre 3). Washington: IMF.
View in Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D. W., & Stiroh, K. J. (2000). Raising the speed limit: US economic Growth in the information age. (OECD Economic Department Working Papers, No. 261, 78).
View in Google Scholar
Kaufman, R. T. (1988). An international comparison of Okun’s Laws. Journal of Compara- tive Economics, 12(2), 82-203.
View in Google Scholar
Knotek, E. (2007). How useful is Okun’s Law?. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, 73-103.
View in Google Scholar
Lee, J. (2000). The robustness of Okun’s law: Evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Macroeconomics, 22(2), 331-356.
View in Google Scholar
Malley, J., & Molana, H. (2008). Output, unemployment and Okun’s Law: Some evidence from the G7. Economic Letters, 101, 113-115.
View in Google Scholar
Moosa, I. A. (1997). A cross-country comparison of Okun’s coefficient. Journal of Comparative Economics, 24, 335-356.
View in Google Scholar
Okun, A. M. (1962). Potential GNP: Its measurement and significance. In Proceedings of the Business and Economics Statistics Section (98-104). Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.
View in Google Scholar
Oliner, S. D., & Sichel, D. E. (2000). The resurgence of growth in the late 1990s: Is information technology the story?. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, 1-48.
View in Google Scholar
Owyang, M. T., Sekhposyan, T., & Vermann, K. (2013, October 1). Output and unemployment. How do they relate today?. The Regional Economist, 5-9.
View in Google Scholar
Silvapulle, P., Moosa, I. A., & Silvapulle, M. J. (2004). Asymmetry in Okun’s Law. Canadian Journal of Economics, 37, 353-374.
View in Google Scholar
Tavera, C., & Perman, R. (2005). A cross country analysis of the Okun’s Law coefficient convergence in Europe. Applied Economics, 37, 2501-2513.
View in Google Scholar
Van Ark, B. V., Inklaar, R., & McGuckin, R. (2002). Changing gear: Productivity, ICT and services. Groningen Growth and Development Center, Research Memorandum GD-60, 1-79.
View in Google Scholar
Vandenbussche, J., Aghion, P., & Meghir, C. (2006). Growth, distance to frontier and composition of human capital. Journal of Economic Growth, 11(2), 97-127.
View in Google Scholar
Villaverde, J., & Maza, A. (2009). The robustness of Okun’s Law in Spain, 1980-2004: Regional evidence. Journal of Policy Modelling, 31(2), 289-297.
View in Google Scholar
Virèn, M. (2001). The Okun curve is non-linear. Economics Letters, 70, 253-257.
View in Google Scholar
Weber, C. E. (1995). Cyclical output, cyclical unemployment, and Okun’s coefficient: A new approach. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10, 433-445.
View in Google Scholar
Téléchargements
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Copyright Poznań University of Economics and Business 2020
Ce travail est disponible sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International .
