Does presidential debate bring optimism? A study of Indonesia’s 2024 pre-election year
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18559/ref.2025.1.1583Keywords:
electability, volatility, stock market, presidential debateAbstract
The political future is inherently unpredictable, particularly in the run-up to elections. This article analyses whether such uncertainty matters. In this paper, we raise an interesting issue of the impact of political debate on the stock market of a developing country. Specifically, we investigate whether people’s economic expectations are conditional on their estimations of potential election outcomes. The subject of this study is the relationship between political events, including the 2024 presidential debate, and Indonesia’s financial markets. The authors analyse stock price movements of the 30 most actively traded issuers, as ranked by the Indonesia Stock Exchange, acknowledging that not all issuers trade daily in this emerging market. Using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, we assess whether significant differences in investor responses exist before and after the debate periods (debates 1 to 5). According to the findings, investors believe that this event has no impact on their economic decisions, because candidate electability is dominated by incumbent candidates, so it is assumed that there will be no significant changes in financial policy. Therefore, investors appear relatively indifferent to the election dynamics during this period. Overall, the results show that Indonesian people anticipate election outcomes.
Downloads
References
Adam, A. (2014). Do elections bring optimism? Electoral Studies, 33, 137–143.
View in Google Scholar
Alford, J. R., Funk, C. L., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Are political orientations genetically transmitted? American Political Science Review, 99(2), 153–167.
View in Google Scholar
Białkowski, J., Dang, H. D., & Wei, X. (2022). High policy uncertainty and low implied market volatility: An academic puzzle? Journal of Financial Economics, 143(3), 1185–1208.
View in Google Scholar
Chen, Z., Da, Z., Huang, D., & Wang, L. (2023). Presidential economic approval rating and the cross-section of stock returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 147(1), 106–131.
View in Google Scholar
Conlin, A., Kyröläinen, P., Kaakinen, M., Järvelin, M.-R., Perttunen, J., & Svento, R. (2015). Personality traits and stock market participation. Journal of Empirical Finance, 33, 34–50.
View in Google Scholar
Dawes, C. T., & Weinschenk, A. C. (2020). On the genetic basis of political orientation. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 173–178.
View in Google Scholar
De Boef, S., & Kellstedt, P. M. (2004). The political (and economic) origins of consumer confidence. American Journal of Political Science, 48(4), 633–649.
View in Google Scholar
Diamonte, R. L., Liew, J. M., & Stevens, R. L. (1996). Political risk in emerging and developed markets. Financial Analysts Journal, 52(3), 71–76.
View in Google Scholar
Forsythe, R., Rietz, T. A., & Ross, T. W. (1999). Wishes, expectations and actions: A survey on price formation in election stock markets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 39(1), 83–110.
View in Google Scholar
Fry, J., & Burke, M. (2020). An options-pricing approach to election prediction. Quantitative Finance, 20(10), 1583–1589.
View in Google Scholar
Goodell, J. W., McGee, R. J., & McGroarty, F. (2020). Election uncertainty, economic policy uncertainty and financial market uncertainty: A prediction market analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 110, 105684.
View in Google Scholar
Herold, M., Kanz, A., & Muck, M. (2021). Do opinion polls move stock prices? Evidence from the US presidential election in 2016. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 80, 665–690.
View in Google Scholar
Kaustia, M., Conlin, A., & Luotonen, N. (2023). What drives stock market participation? The role of institutional, traditional, and behavioral factors. Journal of Banking & Finance, 148, 106743.
View in Google Scholar
Kaustia, M., & Torstila, S. (2011). Stock market aversion? Political preferences and stock market participation. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(1), 98–112.
View in Google Scholar
Kayser, M. A. (2005). Who surfs, who manipulates? The determinants of opportunistic election timing and electorally motivated economic intervention. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 17–27.
View in Google Scholar
Kempf, E., & Tsoutsoura, M. (2021). Partisan professionals: Evidence from credit rating analysts. The Journal of Finance, 76(6), 2805–2856.
View in Google Scholar
Li, J., & Born, J. A. (2006). Presidential election uncertainty and common stock returns in the United States. Journal of Financial Research, 29(4), 609–622.
View in Google Scholar
Martínez, J., & Santiso, J. (2003). Financial markets and politics: The confidence game in Latin American emerging economies. International Political Science Review, 24(3), 363–395.
View in Google Scholar
Matsusaka, J. G., & Sbordone, A. M. (1995). Consumer confidence and economic fluctuations. Economic Inquiry, 33(2), 296–318.
View in Google Scholar
Maulana, N., & Abdullah, D. (2023). Berbeda-beda, Hasil Survei Capres-Cawapres Diragukan. Rakyat Merdeka.Id. https://rm.id/baca-berita/blakblakan/199065/berbedabeda-hasil-survei-caprescawapres-diragukan-muhammad-ramli-rahim-pendukung-amin-jauh-lebih-besar-dari-survei
View in Google Scholar
Merkoulova, Y., & Veld, C. (2022). Why do individuals not participate in the stock market? International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102292.
View in Google Scholar
Mian, A., Sufi, A., & Khoshkhou, N. (2023). Partisan bias, economic expectations, and household spending. Review of Economics and Statistics, 105(3), 493–510.
View in Google Scholar
Monalisa, M. (2024, January 29). 5 Hasil Survei Elektabilitas Capres Jelang Pilpres 2024, Anies, Prabowo & Ganjar Siapa Terkuat? Tribuntrends. https://trends.tribunnews.com/2024/01/29/5-hasil-survei-elektabilitas-capres-jelang-pilpres-2024-anies-prabowo-ganjar-siapa-terkuat?page=all
View in Google Scholar
Montone, M. (2022). Does the U.S. president affect the stock market? Journal of Financial Markets, 61, 100704.
View in Google Scholar
Nadeem, M. A., Qamar, M. A. J., Nazir, M. S., Ahmad, I., Timoshin, A., & Shehzad, K. (2020). How investors attitudes shape stock market participation in the presence of financial self-efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 11.
View in Google Scholar
Nguyen, P. L. T., Alsakka, R., & Mantovan, N. (2023). Political preferences and stock markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 90, 102910.
View in Google Scholar
Pantzalis, C., Stangeland, D. A., & Turtle, H. J. (2000). Political elections and the resolution of uncertainty: The international evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 24(10), 1575–1604.
View in Google Scholar
Pástor, Ľ., & Veronesi, P. (2013). Political uncertainty and risk premia. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(3), 520–545.
View in Google Scholar
Raza, S., Baiqing, S., Kay-Khine, P., & Ali Kemal, M. (2023). Uncovering the effect of news signals on daily stock market performance: An econometric analysis. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(3), 99.
View in Google Scholar
Smith, D. A. (2003). Overturning term limits: The legislature’s own private Idaho? PS: Political Science & Politics, 36(2), 215–220.
View in Google Scholar
Su, C.-W., Yuan, X., Umar, M., & Chang, T. (2023). Is presidential popularity a threat or encouragement for investors? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(2).
View in Google Scholar
Tandelilin, E. (2010). Portofolio dan Investasi: Teori dan aplikasi. Kanisius.
View in Google Scholar
Whiteley, P. (2016). Why do voters lie to the pollsters? Political Insight, 7(1), 16–19.
View in Google Scholar
Wisniewski, T. P. (2016). Is there a link between politics and stock returns? A literature survey. International Review of Financial Analysis, 47, 15–23.
View in Google Scholar
Yiadom, E. B., Tay, V., Sefe, C. E. K., Gbade, V. A., & Osei-Manu, O. (2023). Political change, elections, and stock market indicators: A generalized method of moment analysis. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fidiana Fidiana, Endang Dwi Retnani, Dini Widyawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Research Papers in Economics and Finance (REF) is committed to open access. All of the REF` s paper are free to access immediately from the date of publication. There are no author charges, known as APCs, before release, and no charge for any reader to download articles.
The Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0) applies to articles published in Research Papers in Economics and Finance from Vol. 4, No. 3, 2020 to present. This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. You are free to share and adapt. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
The Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC 4.0) applies to articles published in Research Papers in Economics and Finance up to Vol. 4, No. 2, 2020 inclusive. You are free to share and adapt. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.