Fertilizer subsidies and agricultural productivity in the Senegal River Valley
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18559/rielf.2021.1.5Keywords:
subsidy, fertilizers, agricultural productivity, border approachAbstract
Several subsidy programs have been initiated in Senegal to improve agricul- tural productivity. Thus, this article aims to analyze the impact of fertilizer subsidies on the productivity of farmers. To do this, we first use the stochastic frontier approach to calculate the efficiency scores and then, a censored two-stage Tobit model to capture the effect of subsidies on producer productivity. Results obtained from survey data collected from 125 households in the Senegal River Valley indicate that fertilizer subsidy programs have significantly improved rice productivity. The results suggest several measures aimed at making these programs more effective.
Downloads
References
Aigner, D. J., Lovell, C. K. L., & Schmidt, P. (1997). Frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6(1), 21-37.
View in Google Scholar
Banque Mondiale. (2007). Dimensions structurelles de la liberalization pour l’agriculture et le développement rural. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/afr/ruralstruc
View in Google Scholar
Banque Mondiale. (2013). L’emploi des jeunes en Afrique subsahariènne. Forum Pour Le Développement de l’Afrique, 317.
View in Google Scholar
Bardhan, P., & Mookherjee, D. (2011). Subsidized farm input programs and agricultural performance : A farm-level analysis of West Bengal’s Green Revolution, 1982-1995. American Economic Journal : Applied Economics, 3(4), 186-214.
View in Google Scholar
Carter, M., Laajij, R., & Yang, D. (2014). Des subventions provisoires d’intrants ont des impacts durables sur l’adoption technologique et la pauvreté au Mozambique. INRAE Sciences Sociales, 2.
View in Google Scholar
Chibwana, C., Fisher, M., Jumbe, C., Master, W. A., & Shively, G. (2010). Measuring the impacts of Malawi’s farm input subsidy program. African Association of Agricultural Economists, 9(2), 1-16.
View in Google Scholar
Duflo, E., Kremer, F., & Robinson. J. (2011). Nudging farmers to use fertilizer: Theory and experimental evidence from Kenya. American Review, 101(6), 2350-2390.
View in Google Scholar
FAO. (2016). Socioeconomic context and role of agriculture. Country fact sheet on food and agriculture policy trends.
View in Google Scholar
IPAR (Initiative Prospective Agricole et Rurale). (2015). Subventions des intrants agricole au Sénégal : Controverses et réalités. Rapport annuel sur l’État de l’agriculture et du monde rural au Sénégal.
View in Google Scholar
Jondrow, J., Lovell, C. K. L., Ivan, S., & Schmidt, M. (1982). On the estimation of technical inefficiency in the stochastic frontier production function model. Journal of Econometric. 19(2-3), 233-238.
View in Google Scholar
Mason, N. M., Jayne, T. S., & Mukuba, R. (2013). Zambia’s input subsidy programs. Agricultural Economics, 44(6), 613-628.
View in Google Scholar
Meeusen, W., & van den Broeck, J. (1977). Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic Review, 18, 435-444.
View in Google Scholar
Minviel, J. J., & De Witte, K. (2017). The influence of public subsidies on farm technical efficiency : A robust conditional nonparametric approach. European Journal of Operational research, 259(3), 1112-1120.
View in Google Scholar
Morris, M., Kelly, V. A., Kopicki, R. J., & Byerlee, D. (2007). Fertilizer use in African agriculture : Lessons learned and good practice guidelines. Washington, DC : The World Bank.
View in Google Scholar
Ndiaye, M,. & Fall, A. A. (2019). La technologie du placement profond de l’urée granulée sur la culture du riz répliqué dans la Vallée du Fleuve Sénégal et le Bassin de l’anambé. Agronome Phytotechnicien, 2.
View in Google Scholar
Recensement Général de la Population et de l’Habitat, de l’Agriculture et de l’Elevage (RGPHAE). (2013). Rapport définitif. ANSD.
View in Google Scholar
Ricket-Gilbert, J. (2013). Wage and employment effect of Malawi’s fertilizer subsidy pro- gram. Agricultural Economics, 45(3), 337-353.
View in Google Scholar
Rickert-Gilbert, J., & Janes, T. S. (2011). What are the enduring effect of fertilizer subsidies on recipient Households? Evidence from Malawi. East Lausing: Michigan State University.
View in Google Scholar
Rickert-Gilbert, J., Janes, S., & Chirma, E. (2011). Subsidies and crowding out: A Double- hurdle model of fertilizer Damand in Malawi. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93(1), 26-42.
View in Google Scholar
Rickert-Gilbert, J., & Jayne, T. (2012). Do fertilizer subsidies boost staple crop production and reduce poverty Across the distribution of smallholders in Africa? Quantile regression results from Malawi. ResearchGate.
View in Google Scholar
Seck, A. (2016). Fertilizer subsidy and agricultural productivity in Senegal. (Agrodep Working Papers No. 0024).
View in Google Scholar
Sibande, L., Baley, A., & Davidova, S. (2017). The impact of farm input subsidies on maize marketing in Malawi. Food Policy, 69(C), 190-206.
View in Google Scholar
Wiredu, A., Zeller, M., Diagne, A. (2015). Impact for fertilizer subsidy on land labour productivity of rice producing household in North Ghana. (Center for study of African Economics (CSAE) Conference Contributed Paper, 22-4 March 2015, Oxford).
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Poznań University of Economics and Business
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
