The weak-form efficiency of cryptocurrencies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18559/ref.2023.1.198Keywords:
efficient market hypothesis, adaptive market hypothesis, weak-form efficiency of cryptocurrencies, martingale difference hypothesis, cryptocurrency marketsAbstract
This study aimed to examine the weak-form efficiency of some of the most capitalised cryptocurrencies. The sample consisted of 24 cryptocurrencies selected out of 30 cryptocurrencies with the highest market capitalisation as of October 19, 2022. Stablecoins were not considered. The study covered the period from January 1, 2018 to August 31, 2022. The results of robust martingale difference hypothesis tests suggest that the examined cryptocurrencies were efficient most of the time. However, their efficiency turned out to be time-varying, which validates the adaptive market hypothesis. No evidence was found for the impact of the coronavirus outbreak and the Russian invasion of Ukraine on the weak-form efficiency of the examined cryptocurrencies. The differences in efficiency between the most efficient cryptocurrencies and the least efficient ones were noticeable, but not large. The results also allowed to observe some slight differences in efficiency between the cryptocurrencies with the largest market cap and cryptocurrencies with the lowest market cap. However, the differences between the two groups were too small to draw any far-reaching conclusions about a positive relationship between the market cap and efficiency. The obtained results also did not allow us to detect any trends in efficiency.
Downloads
References
Alvarez-Ramirez, J., & Rodriguez, E. (2021). A singular value decomposition approach for testing the efficiency of Bitcoin and Ethereum markets. Economics Letters, 206, 1–5.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109997
Apopo, N., & Phiri, A. (2021). On the (in)efficiency of cryptocurrencies: have they taken daily or weekly random walks? Heliyon, 7(4), 1–10.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06685
Arouxet, M. B., Bariviera, A. F., Pastor, V. E., & Vampa, V. (2022). COVID-19 impact on cryp¬tocurrencies: Evidence from a wavelet-based Hurst exponent. Physica A, 596, 1–12.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2022.127170
Assaf, A., Bhandari, A., Charif, H., & Demir, E. (2022a). Multivariate long memory struc¬ture in the cryptocurrency market: The impact of COVID-19. International Review of Financial Analysis, 82, 1–17.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2022.102132
Assaf, A., Mokni, K., Yousaf, I., & Bhandari, A. (2022b). Long memory in the high frequency cryptocurrency markets using fractal connectivity analysis: The impact of COVID-19. Research in International Business and Finance, 64, 1–19.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101821
Aslam, F., Slim, S., Osman, M., & Tabche, I. (2022). The footprints of Russia–Ukraine war on the intraday (in)efficiency of energy markets: a multifractal analysis. Journal of Risk Finance, 24(1), 89–104.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-06-2022-0152
Bundi, N., & Wildi, M. (2019). Bitcoin and market (in)efficiency: a systematic time series approach. Digital Finance, 1, 47–65.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-019-00004-z
Campbell, J. Y., Lo, A. W., & MacKinlay, A. C. (1997). The Econometrics of Financial Markets. Princeton. Princeton University Press.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400830213
Charles, A., Darné, O., & Kim, J. H. (2011). Small sample properties of alternative tests for martingale difference hypothesis. Economics Letters, 110(2), 151–154.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2010.11.018
Chu, J., Zhang, Y., & Chan, S. (2019). The adaptive market hypothesis in the high frequen¬cy cryptocurrency market. International Review of Financial Analysis, 64(C), 221–231.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2019.05.008
Escanciano, J. C., & Lobato, I. N. (2009). An automatic Portmanteau test for serial correlation. Journal of Econometrics, 151(2), 140–149.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2009.03.001
Fama, E. F. (1965). The behaviour of stock market prices. Journal of Business, 38(1), 34–105.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/294743
Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient capital markets: a review of theory and empirical work. Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383–417.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1970.tb00518.x
Gaio, L. E., Stefanelli, N. O., Pimenta Júnior, T., Bonacim, C. A. G., & Gatsios, R. C. (2022). The impact of the Russia–Ukraine conflict on market efficiency: Evidence for the de¬veloped stock market. Finance Research Letters, 50, 1–7.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103302
Hawaldar, I. T., Mathukutti, R., & Dsouza, L. J. (2019). Testing the weak form of efficiency of cryptocurrencies: A case study of Bitcoin and Litecoin. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(9), 2301–2305.
View in Google Scholar
Hu, Y., Valera, H. G. A., & Oxley, L. (2019). Market efficiency of the top market-cap crypto¬currencies: Further evidence from a panel framework. Finance Research Letters, 31(C), 138–145.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.04.012
Kakinaka, S., & Umeno, K. (2022). Cryptocurrency market efficiency in short- and long-term horizons during COVID-19: An asymmetric multifractal analysis approach. Finance Research Letters, 46, 1–10.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102319
Khuntia, S., & Pattanayak, J. K. (2018). Adaptive market hypothesis and evolving pre¬dictability of Bitcoin. Economics Letters, 167, 26–28.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.03.005
Khursheed, A., Naeem, M., Ahmed, S., & Mustafa, F. (2020). Adaptive market hypothesis: An empirical analysis of time-varying market efficiency of cryptocurrencies. Cogent Economics and Finance, 8(1), 1–15.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1719574
Kim, J. H. (2009). Automatic variance ratio test under conditional heteroskedasticity. Finance Research Letters, 6(3), 179–185.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2009.04.003
Linton, O. (2019). Financial econometrics. Models and methods. Cambridge University Press.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316819302
Lo, A. W. (2004). The adaptive markets hypothesis: Market efficiency from an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Portfolio Management, 30(5), 15–29.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2004.442611
Lo, A. W. (2005). Reconciling efficient markets with behavioral finance: The adaptive mar¬kets hypothesis. Journal of Investment Consulting, 7(2), 21–44.
View in Google Scholar
López Martín, C., Muela, S. B., & Arguedas, R. (2021). Efficiency in cryptocurrency markets: New evidence. Eurasian Economic Review, 11(3), 403–431.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-021-00182-5
Mandaci, P. E., & Cagli, E. C. (2022). Herding intensity and volatility in cryptocurrency mar¬kets during the COVID-19. Finance Research Letters, 46, 1–7.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102382
Mensi, W., Tiwari, A. K., & Al-Yahyaee, K. H. (2019). An analysis of the weak form efficiency, multifractality and long memory of global, regional and European stock markets. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 72, 168–177.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2018.12.001
Nadarajah, S., & Chu, J. (2017). On the inefficiency of Bitcoin. Economics Letters, 150(C), 6–9.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.10.033
Naeem, M. A., Bouri, E., Peng, Z., Shahzad, S. J. H., & Vo, X. V. (2021). Asymmetric efficiency of cryptocurrencies during COVID19. Physica A, 565, 1–12.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2020.125562
Noda, A. (2021). On the evolution of cryptocurrency market efficiency. Applied Economic Letters, 28(6), 433–439.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1758617
Palamalai, S., Kumar, K. K., & Maity, B. (2021). Testing the random walk hypothesis for lead¬ing cryptocurrencies. Borsa Istanbul Review, 21(3), 256–268.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2020.10.006
Samuelson, P. A. (1965). Proof that properly anticipated prices fluctuate randomly. Industrial Management Review, 6, 41–49.
View in Google Scholar
Sensoy, A. (2019). The inefficiency of Bitcoin revisited: A high-frequency analysis with al¬ternative currencies. Finance Research Letters, 28(C), 68–73.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.04.002
Tran, V. L., & Leirvik, T. (2019). A simple but powerful measure of market efficiency. Finance Research Letters, 29(C), 141–151.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.03.004
Tran, V. L., & Leirvik, T. (2020). Efficiency in the markets of crypto-currencies. Finance Research Letters, 35(C).
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2019.101382
Urquhart, A. (2016). The inefficiency of Bitcoin. Economics Letters, 148(C), 80–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.09.019
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.09.019
Usman, N., & Nduka, K. N. (2022). Announcement effect of COVID-19 on cryptocurrencies. Asian Economics Letters, 3(3).
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.46557/001c.29953
Yonghong, J., He, N., & Weihua, R. (2018). Time-varying long-term memory in Bitcoin mar¬ket. Finance Research Letters, 25(C), 280–284.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2017.12.009
Zhang, W., Wang, P., Li, X., & Shen, D. (2018). The inefficiency of cryptocurrency and its cross-correlation with Dow Jones Industrial Average. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 510, 658–670.
View in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.07.032
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jacek Karasiński

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Editorial Office: Research Papers in Economics and Finance