Risk management system references in construction

Volodymyr Tkachenko; Maryna Klymchuk; Iryna Tkachenko; Tetiana Ilina

doi:10.18559/ref.2020.1.2

Authors

Volodymyr Tkachenko Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Ukraine
Maryna Klymchuk Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Ukraine
Iryna Tkachenko Academy of the State Penitentiary Service https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9068-1054
Tetiana Ilina Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18559/ref.2020.1.2

Keywords:

construction, risk management, dissipation, localization, risk aversion

Abstract

The article examines the basic methods of risk management in construction: risk aversion, localization, dissipation,compensation. The methods are adapted to the specificity of construction companies, taking into account the main directions of their development. For the purpose of effective risk management, formalized functional structuring of risk management in construction is proposed, which will enable the implementation of management functions at two levels – executive and coordinating, with the help of a special structural component in the enterprise management system or a specialized unit in the organizational structure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chernyshev, D., Ivakhnenko, I., Klymchuk, M. (2018). The organization of biosphere compatibility construction: justification of the predictors of building development and the implementation prospects. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7 (3.2), 584-586.
View in Google Scholar

Gerasimova, M.V., Avdeyeva, L.A. (2015). Methodological Approach to Estimating the Total Risk of a Construction Enterprise, Internet Magazine Science, 7(3), 134-142.
View in Google Scholar

Huddleston, J. R. (1986). Distribution of development costs under tax increment financing. Journal of the American Planning Association, 52(2), 194-198.
View in Google Scholar

Meroño-Cerdán, A.L., López-Nicolás & Molina-Castillo, F.J. (2018) Risk aversion, innovation and performance in family firms. Econ. Innov. New Technol., 27, 189–203.
View in Google Scholar

Visser, J.K.& Malan, H.T. (2019) Identification of risk associated with process automation systems. Int. J. Econ. Manag. Eng., 13, 1044–1051.
View in Google Scholar

Kloman H. Felix (2000). Integrated risk assesment. Currnet views of risk management. GARP Aricles, http:// www. garp.com
View in Google Scholar

Klymchuk, M. & Shegda М. (2016). Conceptual principles of the socially responsibile enterprise marketing man- agement. Economics and education, N1, 58 – 61.
View in Google Scholar

Mishra, A.K., Kumar, A., Joshi, P.K.& D’souza, A. (2018) Production risk, risk preference and contract farming: Im- pact on food security in India. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy, 40, 353–378.
View in Google Scholar

Palepu, K.G., Healy, P.M., Bernard, V.L. (2003). Business Analysis and Valuation Using Financial Statements. Text and Cases. South-Western College Pub, 2 edition.
View in Google Scholar

Ratushniak, O.G. (2010). Management of ecological and economic risks of innovative energy-saving projects in construction. Project management and production development, 3(35), 90-94.
View in Google Scholar

Tkachenko, V., Klymchuk, M., Ivakhnenko, I., Ploska H. (2018). Compensatory financing of energy saving projects in construction: modification of TIF. Research Papers in Economics and Finance, 3(1), 47-51.
View in Google Scholar