Theoretical modeling of land between migrants and Son of the Soil: an analysis using game theory

Abstract

Purpose :The objective of this paper is to develop a theoretical model which makes it possible to explain, using game theory, the strategic interactions between two rational agents: migrants and natives (son of soil).

Design/methodology/approach : This model proposes an approach which reveals some key parameters explaining the choice between war and peace when the two parties play simultaneously. It shows that if we neglect migrations towards the rich region, the peaceful solution always seems to be Pareto-dominated by a warlike solution.

Findings: the model explains the parameters that can favor one of the two cooperation or conflicts between migrants and natives. Thus, increased pressure or threats from one of the parties leads to an escalation of the conflict because the two regions are strategic complements. Improving farming techniques, building infrastructure, improving human capital or any measure that increases agricultural productivity facilitates cooperation between the two entities.

Originality/value: The originality of this article lies in the application of game theory to analyze the strategic interactions between migrants and natives in the context of conflicts. The results indicate that an increase in cultural techniques helps reduce tensions, while a rise in remittances exacerbates the risk of conflicts. On the other hand, the migrant labor supply in agriculture promotes resource sharing, although its impact on conflict remains uncertain. This study thus proposes a theoretical model to better understand these complex dynamics and guide policies on integration and migration management.