Clusters as absorbers and diff users of knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2013.1.2349Keywords:
cluster, network, innovation, knowledge transfer, knowledge spilloversAbstract
The last two decades have been characterized by rapid developments in networking and clustering. The first clusters emerged spontaneously, led by internal forces oriented towards competition. Temporary clusters are much more dynamic, searching for other
sources of competitive advantage, and cross national borders. This paper is an attempt to identify the effects of knowledge spillovers and knowledge transfer within regional business networks, especially business clusters. These eff ects are associated with the innovations which appear within such networks and clusters. The paper indicates those barriers and solutions that support innovativeness within the networks under study. Knowledge transfer within business networks that shape the innovative environment in the Wielkopolska region has been described using both a theoretical and practical approach. The findings and conclusions of the research provide an opportunity to increase business efficiency within business networks.
Downloads
References
Basant, R., 2002, Knowledge Flows and Industrial Clusters: An analytical Review of Literature, East-West Center Working Papers, no. 40, East-West Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, February.
View in Google Scholar
Bozemann B., Sarewitz, D., Feinson, S., Foladori G., Gaughan, M., Gupta, A., Sampat, B., Zachary, G., 2003, Knowledge Flows and Knowledge Collectives: Understanding The Role of Science and Technology Policies in Development, Synthesis Report on the Findings off a Project for the Global Inclusion Program of the Rockefeller Foundation, Center for Science, Policy and Outcomes, Columbia University, New York, June, http://www.cspo.org/products/rocky/CSPO_Rockefeller_Vol2.pdf [access: 14.09.2010]. 87
View in Google Scholar
Crespi, G., Criscuolo, Ch., Haskel, J.E., Slaughter, M., 2008, Productivity Growth, Knowledge Flows and Spillovers, NBER Working Paper Series 13959, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, April.
View in Google Scholar
European Commission, Enterprise Directorate General, 2003, Final Report of the Expert Group on Enterprise Clusters and Networks, European Commission, Enterprise Directorate General, Brussels, [access: 14.09.2010].
View in Google Scholar
European Commission, 2006, Delivering on the Modernization Agenda for Universities: Education, Research and Innovation, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, COM (2006) 208, European Commission, Brussels, 10 May, http://ec.europa.eu/education/policies/2010/doc/comuniv2006_en.pdf [access: 14.09.2010].
View in Google Scholar
European Commission, Enterprise and Industry Directorate General, 2007, Innovation Clusters in Europe: a Statistical Analysis and Overview of Current Policy Support, European Commission, Enterprise and Industry Directorate General, Brussels, http://www.proinno-europe.eu/admin/uploaded_documents/innovation_clusters_in_europe.pdf [access: 14.09.2010].
View in Google Scholar
European Commission, 2007a, Green Paper The European Research Area: New Perspectives, COM (2007) 161 final, European Commission, Brussels, 4 April, http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/pdf/era_gp_final_en.pdf [access: 14.09.2010].
View in Google Scholar
Evers, H.D., 2008, Knowledge Hubs and Knowledge Clusters: Designing Knowledge Architecture for Development, ZEF Working Paper Series, Center for Development Research (ZEF), University of Bonn, Bonn.
View in Google Scholar
Fallah, M.H., Sherwat, I., 2004, Knowledge Spillovers and Innovation in Technological Clusters, paper presented at IAMOT conference, April, Washington, D.C., http://www.iamot.org/conference/index.php/ocs/4/paper/viewFile/583/95 [access: 14.09.2010].
View in Google Scholar
Greek P.E., Tull D.S., Album G., 1988, Research for Marketing Decisions, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliff s, March.
View in Google Scholar
Harabi, N., 1997, Channels of R&D Spillovers: An Empirical Investigation of Swiss Firms, Technovation, vol. 17, no. 11–12, pp. 627–635.
View in Google Scholar
Henry, N., Pinch, S.P., 2002, Spatializing Knowledge: Placing the Knowledge Community of Motor Sport Valley, in: Huff , A.S., Jenkins, M. (eds.), Mapping Strategic Knowledge, Sage Publications, London, pp. 137–169.
View in Google Scholar
Jaffe, A., 1986, Technological Opportunity and Spillovers from R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patents, Profi ts and Market Value, American Economic Review, vol. 76 no. 5, pp. 984–1001.
View in Google Scholar
Ketels, C., 2004, European Clusters, in Structural Change in Europe 3 – Innovative City and Business Regions, Hagbarth Publications, Bollschweil.
View in Google Scholar
Ketels, C., Memedovic, O., 2008, From Clusters to Cluster-based Economic Development, International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 375–392.
View in Google Scholar
Lawson, C., 1999, Towards a Competence Th eory of Region, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 151–166.
View in Google Scholar
Levin, R.C., Reiss, P.C., 1988, Cost-reducing and Demand-creating R&D with Spillovers, Rand Journal of Economics, vol. 19 no. 4, pp. 538–556.
View in Google Scholar
Maskell, P., 2001, Towards a Knowledge-based Th eory of the Geographical Cluster, Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 10 no. 4, pp. 921–943.
View in Google Scholar
Maurseth, P.B., Verspagen, B., 2002, Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: A Patent Citations Analysis, Th e Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 531–546.
View in Google Scholar
Morgan, K., 1997, Th e Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal, Regional Studies, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 491–503.
View in Google Scholar
Newman, B., Conrad, K.W., 1999, A Framework for Characterizing Knowledge Management Methods, Practices, and Technologies, in support of The Introduction to Knowledge Management, George Washington University Course EMGT 298.T1, Washington, D.C., Spring, http://www.km-forum.org/KM-Characterization-Framework.pdf [access: 14.09.2010].
View in Google Scholar
Nonaka, I., Takeuchi, H., 1995, Th e Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, Oxford University Press, New York.
View in Google Scholar
Pinch, S., Nick, H., Jenkins, M., Tallman, S., 2003, From ‘Industrial Districts’ to ‘Knowledge Clusters’: A Model of Knowledge Dissemination and Competitive Advantage in Industrial Agglomerations, Journal of Economic Geography, vol. 3, pp. 373–388.
View in Google Scholar
Porter, M., 1998, Clusters and the New Economics of Competition, Harvard Business Review, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 77–90.
View in Google Scholar
Sanchez, R., 2004, ‘Tacit Knowledge’ versus ‘Explicit Knowledge’ Approaches to Knowledge Management Practice, IVS/CBS Working Papers, no. 1, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy, Copenhagen Business School, Copenhagen.
View in Google Scholar
Storper, M., 1993, Regional ‘Worlds’ of Production: Learning and Innovation in Technology Districts of France, Italy and the USA, Regional Studies, vol. 27, pp. 433–456.
View in Google Scholar
Storper, M., 1995, The Resurgence of Regional Economies, Ten Years Later: The Region as a Nexus of Untraded Interdependencies, Journal of European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 191–221.
View in Google Scholar
Tsai, D.H.A., 2005, Knowledge Spillovers and High-technology Clustering: Evidence from Taiwan’s Hsinchu Science-Based Industrial Park, Contemporary Economic Policy, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 116–128.
View in Google Scholar
Zakk, M.H., 1999, Managing Codifi ed Knowledge, Sloan Management Review, vol. 40, pp. 45–58.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Barbara JANKOWSKA, Maciej PIETRZYKOWSKI
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
