Beyond normality: Capital market Value‑at‑Risk modelling using symmetric and asymmetric Laplace distributions

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2026.2.2807

Keywords:

extreme market risk, value at risk, capital markets

Abstract

Evidence on parametric VaR employing both Laplace (exhibiting excessive kurtosis) and asymmetric Laplace (additionally being skewed), “tent-shaped” probability distributions is available, although it remains relatively limited. The research procedure in the paper pursued two primary objectives: to back-test both distributions and assess their ability to capture extreme events, and to determine whether the distribution that best fits the entire empirical distribution is also the one that performs best in back-testing in long-term. The indices considered include WIG30, BVP, CAC, DAX, FTM, HSI, NKX, SHC), SPX and TWSE. The tests were performed using daily data for period between 31 December 1998, and 30 June 2025. Across the ten markets studied, both distributions generally outperformed historical simulation and the normal probability distribution, with the asymmetrical Laplace distribution particularly outperforming the Laplace distribution in capital markets that are likely to be skewed for higher confidence levels (0.99 and 0.975) considered.

JEL Classification

International Financial Markets (G15)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, D., Soleymani, F., Ullah, M. Z., & Hasan, H. (2021). Managing the risk based on entropic Value-at-Risk under a normal-Rayleigh distribution. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 402, 126129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2021.126129
View in Google Scholar

Akaike, H. (1998). Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In E. Parzen, K. Tanabe & G. Kitagawa (Eds), Selected papers of Hirotogu Akaike (pp. 199–213). Springer Science + Business Media.
View in Google Scholar

Altun, E., Tatlidil, H., Özel, G., & Nadarajah, S. (2018). A new generalization of skew-T distribution with volatility models. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 88(7), 1252–1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2018.1427240
View in Google Scholar

Bagnato, L., Potì, V., & Zoia, M. G. (2015). The role of orthogonal polynomials in adjusting hyperpolic secant and logistic distributions to analyse financial asset returns. Statistical Papers, 56(4), 1205–1234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-014-0633-3
View in Google Scholar

Bali, T., G. (2003). An extreme value approach to estimating volatility and Value at Risk. Journal of Business, 76(1), 83–108. https://doi.org/10.1086/344669
View in Google Scholar

Bianchi, M. L. (2014). Are the log-returns of Italian open-end mutual funds normally distributed? A risk assessment perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2463188
View in Google Scholar

Black, F., & Scholes M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637–654.
View in Google Scholar

Bormetti, G., Cisana, E., Montagna, G., & Nicrosini, O. (2007). A non-Gaussian approach to risk measures. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 376, 532–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2006.10.008
View in Google Scholar

Braione, M., & Scholtes, N. K. (2016). Forecasting Value-at-Risk under different distributional assumptions. Econometrics, 4(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics4010003
View in Google Scholar

Brigo, D., Dalessandro, A., Neugebauer, M., & Triki, F. (2007). A stochastic processes toolkit for risk management. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1109160
View in Google Scholar

Buczynski, M., & Chlebus, M. (2024). GARCHNet: Value-at-Risk forecasting with GARCH models based on neural networks. Computational Economics, 63(5), 1949–1979. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-023-10390-7
View in Google Scholar

Carvalhal, A., & Mendes, B. V. M. (2003). Value-at-risk and extreme returns in Asian stock markets. International Journal of Business, 8(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.420266
View in Google Scholar

Chen, C. W. S., Koike, T., & Shau, W. H. (2024). Tail risk forecasting with semiparametric regression models by incorporating overnight information. Journal of Forecasting, 43(5), 1492–1512. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3090
View in Google Scholar

Christoffersen, P. (1998). Evaluating interval forecasts. International Economic Review, 39(4), 841–862. https://doi.org/10.2307/2527341
View in Google Scholar

Guo, Z. Y. (2017). Heavy-tailed distributions and risk management of equity market tail events. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3013749
View in Google Scholar

Harmantzis, F. C., Miao, L., & Chien, Y. (2005). Empirical study of Value-at-Risk and expected shortfall models with heavy tails. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.788624
View in Google Scholar

Huang, Y. C., & Lin, B. J. (2004). Value-at-Risk analysis for Taiwan Stock Index futures: Fat tails and conditional asymmetries in return innovations. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 22, 79–95. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:requ.0000015851.78720.a9
View in Google Scholar

Jędrusik, S., Paliński, A., Chmiel, W., Kadłuczka, P. (2007). Testowanie wsteczne modeli wartości narażonej na stratę. Ekonomia Menedżerska, 1, 175–182.
View in Google Scholar

Jing, H., Liu, Y., & Zhao, J. (2022). Asymmetric Laplace distribution models for financial data: VaR and CVaR. Symmetry, 14(4), 807. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym14040807
View in Google Scholar

Jorion, P. (2007). Value at Risk: The new benchmark for managing financial risk (vol. 3). McGraw-Hill.
View in Google Scholar

Kaczmarzyk, J. (2022). Objective assumptions for the Monte Carlo simulation when historical data with a desired interval have limited size. In A. Bem, K. Daszynska- Zygadlo, T. Hajdíková, E. Jáki & B. Ryszawska (Eds.), Sustainable finance in the green economy (pp. 89–101). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81663-6_6
View in Google Scholar

Kemda, L. E., Huang, C. K., & Chinhamu, K. (2015). Value-at-risk for the USD/ZAR exchange rate: The Variance-Gamma model. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 18(4), 551–566. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v18i4.966
View in Google Scholar

Kim, Y. S., Giacometti, R., Rachev, S. T., Fabozzi, F. J., & Mignacca, D. (2012). Measuring financial risk and portfolio optimization with a non-Gaussian multivariate model. Annals of Operations Research, 201, 325–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-012-1229-8
View in Google Scholar

Kourouma, L., Dupre, D., Sanfilippo, G., & Taramasco, O. (2010). Extreme Value at Risk and expected shortfall during financial crisis. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1744091
View in Google Scholar

Kozubowski, T. J., & Podgórski, K. (2000). A multivariate and asymmetric generalization of Laplace distribution. Computational Statistics, 15(4), 531–540. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022717
View in Google Scholar

Kupiec, P. H. (1995). Techniques for verifying the accuracy of risk measurement models. Journal of Derivatives, 3(2), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.3905/jod.1995.407942
View in Google Scholar

Lechner, L. A., & Ovaert, T. C. (2010). Value‐at‐risk. Techniques to account for leptokurtosis and asymmetric behavior in returns distributions. The Journal of Risk Finance, 11(5), 464–480. https://doi.org/10.1108/15265941011092059
View in Google Scholar

Lee, C. F., & Su, J. B. (2012). Alternative statistical distributions for estimating Value-at-Risk: Theory and evidence. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 39(3), 309–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-011-0256-x
View in Google Scholar

Lee, M. C., Su, J. B., & Liu, H. C. (2008). Value-at-risk in US stock indices with skewed generalized error distribution. Applied Financial Economics Letters, 6(4), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/17446540701765274
View in Google Scholar

Miskolczi, P. (2017). Note on simple and logarithmic return. Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce, 11(1–2), 127–136. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.265595
View in Google Scholar

Mittnik, S., & Paolella, M. S. (2003). Prediction of financial downside-risk with heavy-tailed conditional distributions. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.391261
View in Google Scholar

Morkūnaitė, I., Celov, D., & Leipus, R. (2024). Evaluation of Value-at-Risk (VaR) using the Gaussian mixture models. Research in Statistics, 2(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/27684520.2024.2346075
View in Google Scholar

Pele, D. T., Bolovăneanu, V., Lin, M. B., Ren, R., Ginavar, A. T., Spilak, B., Andrei, A. V., Toma, F. M., Lessmann, S., & Härdle, W. K. (2026). In the beginning was the Word: LLM-VaR and LLM-ES. Expert Systems with Applications, 295, 128676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2025.128676
View in Google Scholar

Richardson, M., Boudoukh, J., & Whitelaw, R. F. (1997). The best of both worlds: A hybrid approach to calculating Value at Risk. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.51420
View in Google Scholar

Serrano Bautista, R., & Núñez Mora, J. A. (2020). Valor en Riesgo en el sector petrolero: Un análisis de la eficiencia en la medición del riesgo de la distribución α-estable versus las distribuciones t-Student generalizada asimétrica y normal. Contaduría y Administración, 65(2), 173. https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2019.2021
View in Google Scholar

Subramoney, S. D., Chinhamu, K., & Chifurira, R. (2021). Value at Risk estimation using GAS models with heavy tailed distributions for cryptocurrencies. International Journal of Finance & Banking Studies, 10(4), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijfbs.v10i4.1316
View in Google Scholar

Taylor, J. W. (2019). Forecasting Value at Risk and expected shortfall using a semiparametric approach based on the asymmetric Laplace distribution. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 37(1), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/07350015.2017.1281815
View in Google Scholar

Theodossiou, P. (2015). Skewed generalized error distribution of financial assets and option pricing. Multinational Finance Journal, 19(4), 223–266. https://doi.org/10.17578/19-4-1
View in Google Scholar

Ullah, M. Z., Mallawi, F. O., Asma, M., & Shateyi, S. (2022). On the conditional Value at Risk based on the Laplace distribution with application in GARCH model. Mathematics, 10(16), 3018. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10163018
View in Google Scholar

Vose, D. (2008). Risk analysis. A quantitative guide. John Wiley & Sons.
View in Google Scholar

Wilmott, P. (2006). Paul Wilmott on quantitative finance (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
View in Google Scholar

Živkov, D. (2025). Investing in portfolio with grains or softs?—Extreme risk analysis with non‐normal VaR models and Omega ratio. Agribusiness, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.70022
View in Google Scholar

Zumbach, G. (2007). Backtesting risk methodologies from one day to one year. Journal of Risk, 9(2), 55–91. https://doi.org/10.21314/jor.2007.144
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2026-05-20

Issue

Section

Research articles

How to Cite

Kaczmarzyk, J. (2026). Beyond normality: Capital market Value‑at‑Risk modelling using symmetric and asymmetric Laplace distributions. Economics and Business Review, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2026.2.2807

Similar Articles

1-10 of 213

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.