Environmental, Social and Governance Responsibility, financial performance and assets: A study of Exchange Traded Funds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18559/ref.2022.2.2Keywords:
Performance, Assets, Ratings, Exchange Traded Funds, Environmental, Social and Governance ResponsibilityAbstract
Two research questions are examined in this study with a sample of 168 passive Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs). The first one asks whether a high Environmental, Social and Governance Responsibility (ESG) rating induces investors to allocate more money in an ETF. The empirical findings indicate that the level of assets is not affected by the ESG rating whatsoever, but it is affected by factors such as the historical performance, the expense ratio and the age of each fund. The second question raised concerns the relationship between the performance of an ETF and its ESG rating. The hypothesis examined is that the higher the ESG rating of an ETF is, the higher the return of the ETF should be. The results do not confirm this hypothesis. Not surprisingly, to a large extent, the performance of ETFs is driven by the return of the tracking indexes. To a lesser degree, expense ratio bears a negative impact on ETFs’ performance.
Downloads
References
Adler, T., & Kritzman, M. (2008). The cost of socially responsible investing. Journal of Portfolio Management, 35(1), 52–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/JPM.2008.35.1.52
View in Google Scholar
Bauer, R., Otten, R., & Tourani-Rad, A. (2006). Ethical investing in Australia: Is there a fi- nancial penalty? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 14(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.12.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2004.12.004
View in Google Scholar
Blitz, D., Huij, J., & Swinkels, L. (2012). The performance of European Index Funds and Exchange-Traded Funds. European Financial Management, 18(4), 649–662. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2010.00550.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2010.00550.x
View in Google Scholar
Capelle-Blancard, G., & Monjon, S. (2014). The performance of socially responsible funds: Does the screening process matter? European Financial Management, 20(3), 494–520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2012.00643.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2012.00643.x
View in Google Scholar
Carhart, M. M. (1997). On persistence in mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance, 52(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x
View in Google Scholar
Chang, C. E., Krueger, T. M., & Witte, H. D. (2020). Relative importance of sustainability measures and costs in mutual fund selection. Journal of Wealth Management Summer, 23(1), 32–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2020.1.103
View in Google Scholar
Chang, C. E., Nelson, W., & Witte, H. D. (2012). Do green mutual funds perform well? Management Research Review, 35(8), 693–708. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211247695 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211247695
View in Google Scholar
Chong, J., & Phillips, G. M. (2016). ESG investing: A simple approach. Journal of Wealth Management, 19(2), 73–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2016.19.2.073
View in Google Scholar
Cortez, M. C., Silva, F., & Areal, N. (2012). Socially responsible investing in the global mar- ket: The performance of US and European funds. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 17(3), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.454 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.454
View in Google Scholar
Derwall, J., Gunster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2005). The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(2), 51–63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v61.n2.2716
View in Google Scholar
Derwall, J., Koedijk, K., & Ter Horst, J. (2011). A tale of value-seeking versus profit-driven investors. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(8), 2137–2147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.01.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.01.009
View in Google Scholar
Dolvin, S., Fulkerson, J., & Krukover, A. (2019). Do good guys finish last? The relationship between Morningstar sustainability ratings and mutual fund performance. Journal of Investing, 28(2), 77–91. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2019.28.2.077
View in Google Scholar
Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfac- tion and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021
View in Google Scholar
Filbeck, A., Filbeck, G., & Zhao, X. (2019). Performance assessment of firms following sus- tainalytics ESG principles. Journal of Investing, 28(2), 7–20. https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2019.28.2.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2019.28.2.007
View in Google Scholar
Gil-Bazo, J., Ruiz-Verdu, P., & Santos, A. A. P. (2010). The performance of socially respon- sible mutual funds: The role of fees and management companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0260-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0260-4
View in Google Scholar
Girard, E., Rahman, H., & Stone, B. A. (2007). Socially responsible investments: Goody- two-shoes or bad to the bone? Journal of Investing, 16(1), 96–110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2007.681827
View in Google Scholar
Goldreyer, E. F., & Dlitz. J. D. (1999). The performance of socially responsible mutual funds: Incorporating sociopolitical information in portfolio selection. Managerial Finance, 25(1), 23–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074359910765830 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074359910765830
View in Google Scholar
Halbritter, G., & Dorfleitner, G. (2015). The wages of social responsibility—Where are they? A critical review of ESG investing. Review of Financial Economics, 26, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2015.03.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2015.03.004
View in Google Scholar
Hamilton, S., Jo, H., & Statman, M. (1993). Doing well while doing good? The investment performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 49(6), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v49.n6.62 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v49.n6.62
View in Google Scholar
Howell, M. J. (2001). Fund age and performance. Journal of Alternative Investments, 4(2), 57–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jai.2001.319011
View in Google Scholar
https://www.ishares.com (accessed: 22.2.2021). https://www.morningstar.com (accessed: 22.2.2021).
View in Google Scholar
Jacobsen, B., Lee, W., & Ma, C. (2019). The alpha, beta, and sigma of ESG: Better beta, additional alpha? Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(6), 6–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2019.1.091
View in Google Scholar
Kanuri, S. (2020). Risk and return characteristics of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Equity ETFs. Journal of Index Investing, 11(2), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2020.1.092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2020.1.092
View in Google Scholar
Kempf, A., & Osthoff, P. (2007). The effect of socially responsible investing on portfolio performance. European Financial Management, 13(5), 908–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2007.00402.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2007.00402.x
View in Google Scholar
Kreander, N., Gray, R. H., Power, D. M., & Sinclair., C. D. (2005). Evaluating the performance of ethical and non-ethical funds: A matched pair analysis. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 32, 1465–1493. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0306-686X.2005.00636.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0306-686X.2005.00636.x
View in Google Scholar
Lee, D. D., Humphrey, J. E., Benson, K. L., & Ahn, J. Y. K. (2010). Socially responsible invest- ment fund performance: The impact of screening intensity. Accounting and Finance, 50, 351–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2009.00336.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2009.00336.x
View in Google Scholar
Marozva, G. (2014). The performance of socially responsible investment funds and exchange-traded funds: Evidence from Johannesburg Stock Exchange. Corporate Ownership and Control, 11(4), 143–152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv11i4p11
View in Google Scholar
Muñoz, F., Vargas, M., & Sanjuán, I. M. (2014). Environmental mutual funds: Financial per- formance and managerial abilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1893-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1893-x
View in Google Scholar
Niblock, S. J., Costa, B. A., Jakob, K., & Sinnewe, E. (2020). Risk-adjusted returns of socially responsible mutual funds II: How do they stack up in Australia? Journal of Investing, 29(2), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2019.1.113 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/joi.2019.1.113
View in Google Scholar
Nofsinger, J., & Varma, A. (2014). Socially responsible funds and market crises. Journal of Banking and Finance, 48, 180–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.016 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.016
View in Google Scholar
Plagge, J.-C., & Grim, D. M. (2020). Have investors paid a performance price? Examining the behavior of ESG Equity Funds. Journal of Portfolio Management, 46(3), 123–140. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2020.46.3.123 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2020.46.3.123
View in Google Scholar
Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008). The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 302–328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.009
View in Google Scholar
Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2011). Is ethical money financially smart? Nonfinancial attributes and money flows of socially responsible investment funds. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 20(4), 562–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2010.12.003 Rompotis, G. G. (2016). Evaluating a new hot trend: The case of Water Exchange- Traded Funds. Journal of Index Investing, 6(4), 103–128. http://doi.org/10.26677/TR1010.2022.1065 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2010.12.003
View in Google Scholar
Rodríguez, J., & Romero, H. (2019). Exchange-Traded Funds as an international diversification tool for socially responsible investors. Journal of Wealth Management, 22(3), 98–102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jwm.2019.1.079
View in Google Scholar
Shank, T., Manullang, D., & Ron, H. (2005). Doing well while doing good revisited: A Study of socially responsible firms’ short-term versus long-term performance. Managerial Finance, 31(8), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350510769794 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350510769794
View in Google Scholar
Silva, F., & Cortez, M. C. (2016). The performance of US and European green funds in dif- ferent market conditions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 135(1), 558–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.112 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.112
View in Google Scholar
Statista. (2021). Asset size of sustainable funds worldwide as of September 2021, by region. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1296334/sustainable-funds-asset-size-by-region/
View in Google Scholar
Statista (2022). Market share of largest providers of Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) in the United States as of September 2022. https://www.statista.com/statistics/294411/market-share-etf-providers-in-the-us/
View in Google Scholar
Statman, M. (2000). Socially responsible mutual funds. Financial Analysts Journal. 56(3), 30–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v56.n3.2358
View in Google Scholar
Statman, M. (2006). Socially responsible indexes. Journal of Portfolio Management, 32(3), 100–109. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2006.628411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2006.628411
View in Google Scholar
Statman, M., & Glushkov, D. (2009). The wages of social responsibility. Financial Analysts Journal, 65(4), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v65.n4.5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v65.n4.5
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Gerasimos Rompotis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Research Papers in Economics and Finance (REF) is committed to open access. All of the REF` s paper are free to access immediately from the date of publication. There are no author charges, known as APCs, before release, and no charge for any reader to download articles.
The Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0) applies to articles published in Research Papers in Economics and Finance from Vol. 4, No. 3, 2020 to present. This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. You are free to share and adapt. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
The Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International license (CC BY-NC 4.0) applies to articles published in Research Papers in Economics and Finance up to Vol. 4, No. 2, 2020 inclusive. You are free to share and adapt. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
How to Cite
EDITORIAL OFFICE: Department of Business Activity and Economic Policy, Instittue of Economics, Poznań University of Economics and Business, al. Niepodległości 10, 61-875 Poznań, Poland, room 621a Alltum, 