Does regional trade integration reinforce or weaken capital mobility? New evidence from four free trade areas

Authors

  • Mehmed Ganic International University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Amila Novalic International University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2023.3.795

Keywords:

regional integration, capital mobility, trading blocs, cointegration estimators.

Abstract

The study aims to empirically determine whether a higher level of trade openness and the presence of better legal protection for investors enhances the impact of trade bloc membership on capital mobility based on four trading blocs: Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), Central American and Dominican Republic Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR), Central European Free Trade Agreement (CEFTA), and the Pacific Alliance. This study employs the fully modified and dynamic ordinary least squares estimators and a panel quantile regression cointegration estimator. The study finds that a country's affiliation with a trade bloc improves capital mobility in the whole group and EAEU region, low capital mobility in the Pacific Alliance region and moderate low capital mobility in the CAFTA-DR region. The legal protection system alone provided for the investors does not improve the level of capital mobility unless its interaction with investment is included. Also the study reveals that high trade openness does not necessarily lead to better capital mobility for the studied trade blocs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bayoumi, T. (1990), Saving-investment correlations: Immobile capital, government policy, or endogenous behaviour. IMF Staff Papers, 37(2), 360–387.
View in Google Scholar

Behar-Villegas, E. (2022). Absurda lex, sed lex? Public value and the decay of the rule of law: A conceptual perspective. Economics and Business Review, 8(3), 7–26. https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2022.3.2
View in Google Scholar

Bilas, V. (2007). Regional economic integrations and capital movement—measuring the level of capital mobility. Ekonomski Fakultet Rijeka, 25(2), 269–290.
View in Google Scholar

Breusch, T. S., & Pagan, A. R. (1980). The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies, 47(1), 239–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297111
View in Google Scholar

Cavallo, E., & Frankel, J. (2008). Does openness to trade make countries more vulnerable to sudden stops, or less? Using gravity to establish causality. Journal of International Money and Finance, 27(8), 1430–1452.
View in Google Scholar

Coakley, J., Kulasi, F., & Smith, R. (1996) Current account solvency and the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle. Economic Journal, 106(436), 620–627.
View in Google Scholar

Collier, P. (1991). Africa’s external economic relations: 1960–90. African Affairs, 90(360), 339–356.
View in Google Scholar

Dornbusch, R. (1989). The dollar in the 1990s: Competitiveness and the challenges of the new economic blocs. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Conference.
View in Google Scholar

Drakos, A., Kouteras, G., & Vlamis, P. (2018). Saving, investment and capital mobility in EU member countries: A panel data analysis of the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle. Applied Economics, 50(34–35), 3798–3811.
View in Google Scholar

Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460.
View in Google Scholar

Feldstein, M., & Bacchetta, P. (1991). National saving and international investment. NBER National Saving and Economic Performance, pp. 201–226. National Bureau of Economic Research.
View in Google Scholar

Feldstein, M., & Horioka, C. (1980). Domestic saving and international capital flows. Economic Journal, 90, 314–329.
View in Google Scholar

Frankel, J. A. (1991). Quantifying capital mobility in the 1980’s. In D. Bernheim & J. Shoven (Eds.), National saving and economic performance (pp. 227–280). University of Chicago Press.
View in Google Scholar

Frankel, J. A. (1995). Quantifying international capital mobility in the 1980s. In J. A. Frankel (Ed.), Exchange rates (pp. 41–72). MIT Press.
View in Google Scholar

Ganić, M. (2020). Financial globalization. In M. Ganić (Ed.), Financial globalization in the emerging Balkans (pp. 29–47). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65009-4_3
View in Google Scholar

Giannone, D., & Lenza, M. (2004). The Feldstein–Horioka fact. Working Paper series, 873.
View in Google Scholar

Holmes, M. (2005). What do savings-investment correlations tell us about the international capital mobility of less developed countries? Journal of Economic Integration, 20(3), 590–603.
View in Google Scholar

Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74.
View in Google Scholar

Isaksson, A. (2001). Financial liberalisation, foreign aid, and capital mobility: Evidence from 90 developing countries. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 11(3–4).
View in Google Scholar

Jansen, W. J. (2000). International capital mobility: Evidence from panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 19(4), 507–511.
View in Google Scholar

Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, 231–254.
View in Google Scholar

Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Economic, 90, 1–44.
View in Google Scholar

Ketenci, N. (2014). Capital mobility in the panel GMM framework: Evidence from EU members. MPRA Paper, 59014.
View in Google Scholar

Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile regression. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754098
View in Google Scholar

Koenker, R., & Hallock, K. (2001). Quantile regression. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 143–156.
View in Google Scholar

Kumar, S. (2015). Regional integration, capital mobility and financial intermediation revisited: Application of general to specific method in panel data. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 36(C), 1–17.
View in Google Scholar

Kumar, S., Sen, R., & Srivastava, S. (2014). Does economic integration stimulate capital mobility? An analysis of four regional economic communities in Africa. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 29, 33–50.
View in Google Scholar

La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.
View in Google Scholar

Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
View in Google Scholar

Markusen, J. R. (1983). Factor movements and commodity trade as complements. Journal of International Economics, 14(3–4), 341–56.
View in Google Scholar

Masud-Alam, M., & Rafiqul-Islam, M. (2010). Revisiting the Feldstein–Horioka hypothesis of savings, investment, and capital mobility: Evidence from 27 EU countries. MPRA Paper, 39383. University Library of Munich, Germany.
View in Google Scholar

Matthews, A. (2003). Regional integration and food security in developing countries. Paper prepared for a Food and Agriculture Organization Workshop on Regional Integration, Common Agricultural Policies and Food Security, May 6–9. Pretoria.
View in Google Scholar

Midagu, G., Kwela, B., & Kazadi, J. (2020). Capital mobility in Africa: A re-examination of the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle. Hal Open Science, 03371984.
View in Google Scholar

Murthy, V., & Ketenci, N. (2020). Capital mobility in Latin American and Caribbean countries: New evidence from dynamic common correlated effects panel data modelling. Financial Innovation, 6, 48.
View in Google Scholar

Obstfeld, M. (1986).Capital mobility in the world economy: Theory and measurement. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 24, 55–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(86)90005-9
View in Google Scholar

Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff, K. (1995) The intertemporal approach to the current account. Handbook of International Economics, 3, 1731–1799.
View in Google Scholar

Obstfeld, M. & Rogoff, K. (2000). The six major puzzles in international macroeconomics: Is there a common cause? NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 15(1), 339–390.
View in Google Scholar

Padawassou, S. (2012). Capital mobility in African countries. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(11), 29–42.
View in Google Scholar

Payne, J., & Kumazawa, R. (2005). Capital mobility, foreign aid, and openness: Further panel data evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Economics and Finance, 29, 123–127.
View in Google Scholar

Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 653–670.
View in Google Scholar

Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics, 0435. Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

Pesaran, M. H., Ullah, A., & Yamagata, T. (2008). A bias-adjusted LM test of error cross-section independence. The Econometrics Journal, 11(1), 105–127. http:// www.jstor.org/stable/23116064
View in Google Scholar

Pesaran, M. H. & Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50–93.
View in Google Scholar

Phillips, P. C. B., & Hansen, B. E. (1990). Statistical inference in instrumental variables regression with I(1) processes, Review of Economic Studies, 57, 99–125.
View in Google Scholar

Rocha, F. (2006). Capital mobility in developing countries: Evidence from panel data. Estudos Economicos, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-41612007000300004
View in Google Scholar

Rymarczyk J. (2021). The impact of industrial revolution 4.0 on international trade. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 9 (1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.15678/EBER.2021.090107
View in Google Scholar

Shleifer, A., & Wolfenzon, D. (2002). Investor protection and equity markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 106, 1–53.
View in Google Scholar

Sinha, T., & Sinha, D. (2004). The mother of all puzzles would not go away. Economics Letters, 82(2), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2003.06.002
View in Google Scholar

Sinn, S. (1992). Saving-investment correlations and capital mobility: On the evidence from annual data. The Economic Journal, 102(414), 1162–1170. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234383
View in Google Scholar

Sobański, K. (2019). ‘Dark matter’ in the external sector of the United States. Economics and Business Review, 5(2), 86–108. https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2019.2.5
View in Google Scholar

Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (1993). A simple estimator of cointegrating vectors in higher order integrated systems. Econometrica, 61, 783–820.
View in Google Scholar

Syssoyeva-Masson, I., & Sousa Andrade, J. (2015). Capital mobility in the enlarged Europe: A new look at the Feldstein–Horioka puzzle using a quantile regression approach. Dalloz Revue d’Économie Politique, 125, 571–599.
View in Google Scholar

Taylor, A. (1996). International capital mobility in history: The saving-investment relationship. NBER Working Paper, 5743.
View in Google Scholar

Tesar, L. (1991). Saving, investment and international capital flows. Journal of International Economics, 31, 55–78.
View in Google Scholar

Yildirim, M., & Yildirim, A. (2020). The Feldstein-Horioka puzzle: Evidence from emerging countries. Erciyes Universitesi Iktisadi ve Idari Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, 55(1), 141–158.
View in Google Scholar

Yersh, V. (2022). International and regional capital mobility in Latin American countries. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28(2), 337–357.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2023-08-28 — Updated on 2023-10-12

Versions

How to Cite

Ganic, M., & Novalic, A. (2023). Does regional trade integration reinforce or weaken capital mobility? New evidence from four free trade areas. Economics and Business Review, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2023.3.795 (Original work published August 28, 2023)

Issue

Section

Research article- regular issue